★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<p><note>This <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> <gap/> <gap/>. <gap/> <lb/> </note>A decision grounded when a statute always de- <lb/> claims that the fact in question is <del><gap/></del> <hi rend='superscript'>an individual</hi><lb/> <note>mentioned in the di-<lb/> rectory <unclear>part</unclear> <lb/> had been <gap/>-<lb/> -ted known as about <lb?> to be made <hi rend='superscript'><gap/></hi> attend-<lb/> - and in every indi-<lb/>-vidual <unclear>faction</unclear> <gap/> <lb/> [<gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/>] <lb/> <del><gap/> consequence.</del></note> of that <del><gap/></del><hi rend='superscript'> <unclear>thinks</unclear></hi> of facts <hi rend='superscript'>as one thinks of <gap/> <gap/> of <gap/> </hi>on which the <hi rend='superscript'><gap/>is of <gap/></hi> <unclear>thoughts</unclear><lb/> <hi rend='superscript'>-knownst</hi> of the <gap/> <gap/> it <gap/> <gap/> of a <gap/><lb/> hand <del><gap/> decision <hi rend='superscript'><gap/> <gap/> of <gap/> thoughts</hi> <gap/> made <gap/> <gap/> a </del> — | <p><note>This <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> <gap/> <gap/>. <gap/> <lb/> </note>A decision grounded when a statute always de- <lb/> claims that the fact in question is <del><gap/></del> <hi rend='superscript'>an individual</hi><lb/> <note>mentioned in the di-<lb/> rectory <unclear>part</unclear> <lb/> had been <gap/>-<lb/> -ted known as about <lb?> to be made <hi rend='superscript'><gap/></hi> attend-<lb/> - and in every indi-<lb/>-vidual <unclear>faction</unclear> <gap/> <lb/> [<gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/>] <lb/> <del><gap/> consequence.</del></note> of that <del><gap/></del><hi rend='superscript'> <unclear>thinks</unclear></hi> of facts <hi rend='superscript'>as one thinks of <gap/> <gap/> of <gap/> </hi>on which the <hi rend='superscript'><gap/>is of <gap/></hi> <unclear>thoughts</unclear><lb/> <hi rend='superscript'>-knownst</hi> of the <gap/> <gap/> it <gap/> <gap/> of a <gap/><lb/> hand <del><gap/> decision <hi rend='superscript'><gap/> <gap/> of <gap/> thoughts</hi> <gap/> made <gap/> <gap/> a </del> — | ||
The specific rule <gap/> <lb/> [or rather the <gap/>, to I think with <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> with his life <unclear>precision</unclear>] that is the proposition <lb/> producing these two <unclear>specific</unclear> <gap/> one <del>of <gap/> or </del><lb/> <del> <gap/> </del> as <gap/> <unclear>from</unclear> the other with it<lb/> has been formed by the <gap/> authority, <unclear>clothed</unclear><lb/> in certain language, and that language<lb/> fixed by certain <unclear>permanent</unclear> natural <unclear>works</unclear>, then <gap/> upon a <hi rend='superscript'><gap/></hi><unclear>permanent</unclear> <hi rend='superscript'>natural</hi> <gap/>, the<lb/> <gap/> in a word it is a written Law. <lb/> When this decision is grounded upon the Common<lb/> Law that is upon <gap/> decisions, no <unclear>words</unclear><lb/> | The specific rule <gap/> <lb/> [or rather the <gap/>, to I think with <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> with his life <unclear>precision</unclear>] that is the proposition <lb/> producing these two <unclear>specific</unclear> <gap/> one <del>of <gap/> or </del><lb/> <del> <gap/> </del> as <gap/> <unclear>from</unclear> the other with it<lb/> has been formed by the <gap/> authority, <unclear>clothed</unclear><lb/> in certain language, and that language<lb/> fixed by certain <unclear>permanent</unclear> natural <unclear>works</unclear>, then <lb/> <note>and if that campaign <lb/> for <del>object of <gap/></del><gap/><lb/> <gap/> <del><gap/> of <gap/></del> <lb/> <gap/> <gap/> has <lb/> been <gap/> <gap/><lb/> <gap/> this object of <gap/>-<lb/> -<gap/> changed from the <lb/> <gap/> to this <gap/> by <gap/><lb/></note><unclear>cultures</unclear> upon a <hi rend='superscript'><gap/></hi><unclear>permanent</unclear> <hi rend='superscript'>natural</hi> <gap/>, the<lb/> <gap/> in a word it is a written Law. <lb/> When this decision is grounded upon the Common<lb/> Law that is upon <gap/> decisions, no <unclear>words</unclear><lb/> <note>a decision upon <unclear>a</unclear> <lb/> <gap/> for <unclear>custom</unclear> <gap/>.<lb/> <gap/><lb/> upon another footing </lb> and decisions upon<lb/> other <lb/> <gap/> <del><gap/><lb/> <gap/></del> as <gap/> as what<lb/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <unclear>dance</unclear> of <lb/> best decisions, <gap/>-<lb/> -grated <unclear>practicable</unclear> <gap/> <hi rend='superscript'>again</hi> when <lb/> <gap/></note> <gap/> <gap/>. <del><gap/> is <gap/> <gap/> <hi rend='superscript'><gap</del></hi> of <gap/><gap/></del><lb/> <del><gap/></del>. The decision is <hi rend='underline'><unclear>"guard"</unclear></hi> from such<lb/> a rule <hi rend='superscript'><del><unclear>No such</unclear> <gap/> <unclear>for there</unclear> <gap/></del></hi><del><gap/> rule is <gap/> which is a</del> <lb/> No such rule can exist because <gap/> is <gap/><lb/> then the idea <unclear>compounded</unclear> in [that <gap/> of] this<lb/> decision. Every decision is <unclear>handwritten</unclear>; <gap/><lb/> -ded upon the particular fact which <gap/><lb/> for it. This natural rule, is a rule which<lb/> <note>LAW Common X Statute.</note> is <unclear>happened</unclear>, a <unclear>figment</unclear> of the imagination, <gap/><lb/> by <gap/>, on the one hand from <del>the</del><hi rend='superscript'>a <gap/></hi><lb/> particular fact <gap/> this from a particular<lb/> <gap/> <gap/> with it, in this manner <gap/><lb/> have mastered.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
Click Here To Edit LAW & COMMON STATUTE —Decisions all particular. No General Rule Exists
In a word to commons an illustration from Nature
Philosophy [a natural way]. A Decision
founded on a Statute is a ray of light if using
from the Statute as its Radiant. A Decision
founded when Common Law is a way of using
an , which are very its false Radi-
ant.
---page break---
This
.
A decision grounded when a statute always de-
claims that the fact in question is an individual
mentioned in the di-
rectory part
had been -
-ted known as about <lb?> to be made attend-
- and in every indi-
-vidual faction
[ ]
consequence. of that thinks of facts as one thinks of of on which the is of thoughts
-knownst of the it of a
hand decision of thoughts made a —
The specific rule
[or rather the , to I think with
with his life precision] that is the proposition
producing these two specific one of or
as from the other with it
has been formed by the authority, clothed
in certain language, and that language
fixed by certain permanent natural works, then
and if that campaign
for object of
of
has
been
this object of -
- changed from the
to this by
cultures upon a permanent natural , the
in a word it is a written Law.
When this decision is grounded upon the Common
Law that is upon decisions, no words
a decision upon a
for custom .
upon another footing </lb> and decisions upon
other
as as what
dance of
best decisions, -
-grated practicable again when
. is <hi rend='superscript'><gap</hi> of
. The decision is "guard" from such
a rule No such for there rule is which is a
No such rule can exist because is
then the idea compounded in [that of] this
decision. Every decision is handwritten;
-ded upon the particular fact which
for it. This natural rule, is a rule which
LAW Common X Statute. is happened, a figment of the imagination,
by , on the one hand from thea
particular fact this from a particular
with it, in this manner
have mastered.
|
Identifier: | JB/050/073/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
050 |
procedure code |
||
|
073 |
law common & statute - decisions all particular - no general rule exists |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif]]] |
||
|
16064 |
|||
