JB/050/044/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/044/001: Difference between revisions

Grantcj (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Grantcj (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p><unclear>Privilege</unclear> of Sanctuary has been long looked upon in this Country as one of the most enormous <unclear>abused</unclear> that the administration of <gap/> is capable of. And one should as soon expect to see an advocate for the innocence of <gap/>, as for the adoption <gap/>. Yet for whatever <gap/> <unclear>been</unclear> urged <unclear>against</unclear> it, may be <unclear>urged</unclear> with, and force again <unclear>I</unclear> the <unclear>Acquitted</unclear> of <gap/> upon informality in <unclear>questionable reading</unclear>, for <gap/> [our] Laws has been so frequently <gap/> extolled. Of <unclear>questionable reading</unclear> it may be and that they only differ <gap/> and these more and <unclear>life</unclear>. in <unclear>questionable reading</unclear> of <gap/> may he equally laid. <gap/> they make the [<gap/>] of the Culprit depend upon a <unclear>contingency</unclear> <gap/> <add>independent of</add> <unclear>unconnected</unclear> with the innocence [or guilt] that the <gap/> better chance for the <gap/> they afford. Than <gap/>; may the <gap/> the <gap/> that <add>it is</add> their are <add>to the <gap/><unclear>questionable reading</unclear> most wholy to be</add> more <gap/> to the guilty than to the innocent. For this <gap/>, <gap/> are undoubtedly the most lightened more <gap/>  have <gap/> to <gap/> the <gap/>. But it was been said and in <gap/>, that it very happen <gap/> innocent, but who by the ignorance <gap/> of the jury or by <gap/> of <gap/> has been pronounced guilty, may <gap/> in them <gap/> of that it is better that a <gap/> guilty he <unclear>declared</unclear> than one innocent <gap/></p>
<p><unclear>Privilege</unclear> of Sanctuary has been long looked upon in this<lb/> Country as one of the most enormous <unclear>abused</unclear> that<lb/> the administration of <gap/> is capable of. And one<lb/> should as soon expect to see an advocate for the<lb/> innocence of <gap/>, as for the adoption<lb/> <gap/>. Yet for whatever <gap/> <unclear>been</unclear> urged <unclear>against</unclear> it,<lb/> may be <unclear>urged</unclear> with, and force again <unclear>I</unclear> the <unclear>Acquitted</unclear><lb/> of <gap/> upon informality in <unclear>questionable reading</unclear>, for<lb/> <gap/> [our] Laws has been so<lb/> frequently <gap/> extolled. Of <unclear>questionable reading</unclear> it may be and<lb/> that they only differ <gap/> and these<lb/> more and <unclear>life</unclear>. in <unclear>questionable reading</unclear> of <gap/> may he <lb/>equally laid. <gap/> they make the [<gap/>] of<lb/> the Culprit depend upon a <unclear>contingency</unclear> <gap/> <lb/><add>independent of</add> <unclear>unconnected</unclear> with the innocence [or guilt] that the<lb/> <gap/> better chance for the <gap/><lb/> they afford. Than <gap/>; may the <gap/> the <gap/><lb/> that <add>it is</add> their are <add>to the <gap/><lb/><unclear>questionable reading</unclear> most wholy to be</add> more <gap/> to the guilty than to the innocent. For this <gap/>, <gap/> are<lb/> undoubtedly the most lightened more <gap/>  have <gap/> to <gap/><lb/> the <gap/>. But it was been said and in <gap/>, that it very happen <gap/><lb/> innocent, but who by the ignorance <gap/> of<lb/> the jury or by <gap/> of<lb/> <gap/> has been pronounced guilty, may <gap/><lb/> in them <gap/> of that it is better that a <gap/><lb/> guilty he <unclear>declared</unclear> than one innocent <gap/></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 18:40, 11 January 2013

Click Here To Edit

Privilege of Sanctuary has been long looked upon in this
Country as one of the most enormous abused that
the administration of is capable of. And one
should as soon expect to see an advocate for the
innocence of , as for the adoption
. Yet for whatever been urged against it,
may be urged with, and force again I the Acquitted
of upon informality in questionable reading, for
[our] Laws has been so
frequently extolled. Of questionable reading it may be and
that they only differ and these
more and life. in questionable reading of may he
equally laid. they make the [] of
the Culprit depend upon a contingency
independent of unconnected with the innocence [or guilt] that the
better chance for the
they afford. Than ; may the the
that it is their are to the
questionable reading most wholy to be
more to the guilty than to the innocent. For this , are
undoubtedly the most lightened more have to
the . But it was been said and in , that it very happen
innocent, but who by the ignorance of
the jury or by of
has been pronounced guilty, may
in them of that it is better that a
guilty he declared than one innocent


Identifier: | JB/050/044/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

044

Info in main headings field

certainty jeofails flaws acquittal oy. law

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f69

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

ia

Marginals

Paper Producer

fr4

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16035

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in