JB/002/285/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/002/285/001: Difference between revisions

Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<note><head>27 Sept 1800 +<!-- in pencil --> 189</head>
<head>27 Sept 1800 +<!-- in pencil --> 189</head>
Annuity Notes Abstract <gap/> <gap/></note><lb/>
<note>Annuity Notes Abstract <gap/> <gap/></note><lb/>


<note>Ch. X.Y.</note>  
<p><note>Ch. X.Y.</note>  
<add>For [+] I say to prudence: for [+]</add>
<add>For [+] I say to prudence: for [+]</add>
<note><hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> <del>For</del>, as to sympathy for the sufferings of the individuals <unclear>damnified</unclear>, the <add>professedly</add> <del><gap/></del> <del><gap/></del> vindicative measures, pursued <add>afterwards</add> against the <unclear>repugnants</unclear>, are a sufficient <add>proof</add> that no such motive was consulted on the arrangement of the <unclear>terms</unclear>.   
<note><hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> <del>For</del>, as to sympathy for the sufferings of the individuals <unclear>damnified</unclear>, the <add>professedly</add> <del><gap/></del> <del><gap/></del> vindicative measures, pursued <add>afterwards</add> against the <unclear>repugnants</unclear>, are a sufficient <add>proof</add> that no such motive was consulted on the arrangement of the <unclear>terms</unclear>.   
</note>
</note>
<del>tenderness of the sufferings of <gap/> of such a multitude <add>such a multitude of</add></del><lb/>
<del>the individuals in question who would find themselves</del><lb/>
<del>subjected to a defalcation to the amount of a fourth part</del><lb/>
<del>of their respective incomes from the source it appears</del><lb/>
<del>from the language <unclear>told</unclear> as well as the couse taken in</del><lb/>
<del>regard to the <unclear>Non consenters</unclear> that no such feelings were</del><lb/>
<del><unclear>consulted</unclear>, <add>as to <unclear>the regard</unclear> for the feelings of individuals <gap/></add> it will soon appear whether a <unclear>consideration</unclear> of that <add>any regard that <unclear>way</unclear></add></del><lb/>
<del>sort were much attended to [in the planning of the <unclear>measure</unclear>]</del></p>
1. A years interest was allowed in the first plan without<lb/>
<del>reduction</del> <add>reduction: ..: the amount of the one per Cent <add>that was to be afterwards</add> struck off by the reduction <add>(£577,034)</add></add> was allowed for in the first year: (a)<!-- in red --> <note>(a)Note is under the <unclear>tax</unclear><!-- note in red --></note>
<del>This however <gap/> <add>Note (a)<!-- in red --></add> it may be said should</del><lb/>
<add>(a)<!-- in red --> This (it may be thought) should</add> not be considered as constituting part of the <hi rend='underline'>bonus</hi>, inasmuch<lb/>
as in some of the Acts, and <del>probably in all, it</del> <add>probably</add><lb/>
<add><del>perhaps</del> in all <add>the Acts.</add> prior to that date, it</add> will be found that a years notice previous to redemption<lb/>
was among the stipulated terms.





Revision as of 15:21, 17 January 2013

File:JB 002 285 001.jpg

Click Here To Edit

27 Sept 1800 + 189 Annuity Notes Abstract

Ch. X.Y. For [+] I say to prudence: for [+] [+] For, as to sympathy for the sufferings of the individuals damnified, the professedly vindicative measures, pursued afterwards against the repugnants, are a sufficient proof that no such motive was consulted on the arrangement of the terms. tenderness of the sufferings of of such a multitude such a multitude of
the individuals in question who would find themselves
subjected to a defalcation to the amount of a fourth part
of their respective incomes from the source it appears
from the language told as well as the couse taken in
regard to the Non consenters that no such feelings were
consulted, as to the regard for the feelings of individuals it will soon appear whether a consideration of that any regard that way
sort were much attended to [in the planning of the measure]

1. A years interest was allowed in the first plan without
reduction reduction: ..: the amount of the one per Cent <add>that was to be afterwards struck off by the reduction (£577,034)</add> was allowed for in the first year: (a) (a)Note is under the tax This however Note (a) it may be said should
(a) This (it may be thought) should not be considered as constituting part of the bonus, inasmuch
as in some of the Acts, and probably in all, it probably
perhaps in all <add>the Acts. prior to that date, it</add> will be found that a years notice previous to redemption
was among the stipulated terms.




Identifier: | JB/002/285/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 2.

Date_1

1800-09-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

2a

Box

002

Main Headings

annuity notes

Folio number

285a"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 285.

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

note (a)

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f189

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1798 a<…>

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

frances wright

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1798

Notes public

ID Number

1024

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in