JB/051/286/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/286/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:




26-Jan-2013: Proofreading: under construction by Diane Folan.  Please do not amend.
<!-- NB: please note the first two partial folios have been deleted diagonally (either in ink and pencil or in pencil).  Delete tags have therefore been added.  Amend as necessary. -->
 
 
<!-- NB: please note the first two partial folios have been deleted diagonally.  Delete tags have therefore been added.  Amend as necessary. -->


<p><del><note>Appeal  III. Remedia</note><!-- note in pencil -->  and improved all concurr in manifesting the
<p><del><note>Appeal  III. Remedia</note><!-- note in pencil -->  and improved all concurr in manifesting the
<lb/>
<lb/>
importance of uniformity .
importance of uniformity .
<lb/></p>
<lb/></del></p>


<!-- horizontal line, in pencil -->
<!-- horizontal line, in pencil -->
<pb/>
<pb/>


<p><!-- indented --><note>Note addition</note>  The consideration of uniformity <add>of decision ,</add> though naturally
<p><!-- indented --><del><note>Note addition</note>  The consideration of uniformity <add>of decision ,</add> though naturally
<lb/>
<lb/>
connected with that of rectitude of decision
connected with that of rectitude of decision
Line 28: Line 25:
<pb/>
<pb/>


<head>Note</head><!-- left of centre -->
<p><note>Appeal III  . Remedia .</note><!-- in pencil -->  <del>the remedy they would propose.</del>
<lb/></p>
<!-- horizontal line -->
<pb/>
<p><!-- indented --><del><note>English practice  Reports of <unclear>decisions</unclear> in <unclear>Statute</unclear></note><!-- note in pencil -->  In England no sooner does a clause in a
<lb/>
Statute become the subject of decision , than the <del>public</del> <add><del>science</del></add>
<lb/>
<add>is <add><del>is loaded</del></add> <add><del>gratified</del></add> <del>are cursed</del> <add>science is loaded</add> with a history of the arguments at
<lb/>
large in <add>ten or</add> twenty <del>or thirty</del> folio pages which are either
<lb/>
useless or of which the alteration of a single word in
<lb/>
<lb/>
the Statute would have superseded the use .  And thus
<lb/>
<lb/>
 
the Statute &#x2014; law instead of staying , serves only to
proofreading from here................................................................................................................................
<lb/>
<lb/>
 
<del>its</del> <sic>encrease</sic> , the plague of Common Law. Yet even
 
<head>Note</head><!-- left of centre -->
<p><note>Appeal III . Remedia .</note><!-- in pencil -->  <del>the remedy they would propose.</del>
<lb/></p>
 
<p><!-- indented -->In England no sooner does a clause in a
<lb/>
<lb/>
Statute become the subject of decision , than the <del>public</del> <add>science</add>
this plague is a blessing in comparison of a set of unpublished decisions convertible into <add>at the pleasure of any bookseller or of any note-holder</add> <!-- foreign text checked: https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=ex-post-facto&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a --><foreign><sic>ex-post-facto</sic><!-- no hyphens! --></foreign> laws .
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>is <add><del>is loaded</del></add> <del>are cursed</del> <add><del>gratified</del></add> <add>science is loaded</add> with a history of the arguments at
<del>at the pleasure of any note-taker who happens</del> <add><del>finds motives</del></add> <del>to produce
<lb/>
<lb/>
large in <add><gap/> or</add> <gap/> <del>in thirty</del> folio pages which are either
them out of his <gap/></del>  
<lb/><del></p>


<pb/>


<head><note><del>Ch E<gap/></del></note>  Addition to <del>n</del>Note (g) to <gap/><!-- symbol - double vertical parallel lines -->. 3 .  being the last note</head>


<lb/></p>
<pb/>
<head><del><gap/></del>  Addition to <del>n</del>Note (g) to <gap/><!-- symbol -->. 3 .  being the last note</head>
<p><!-- indented -->Private interests would likewise interfere <del><gap/> the decision
<p><!-- indented -->Private interests would likewise interfere <del><gap/> the decision
<lb/>
<lb/>
on in the business</del> <add>with the decision</add> and shake the probity , or what would
<unclear>on</unclear> in the business</del> <add>with the decision ,</add> and shake the probity , or what would
<lb/>
<lb/>
be as bad the reputation for probity of those who were to
be as bad the reputation for probity of those who were to

Revision as of 22:15, 26 January 2013

Click Here To Edit


Appeal III. Remedia and improved all concurr in manifesting the
importance of uniformity .


---page break---

Note addition The consideration of uniformity of decision , though naturally
connected with that of rectitude of decision
is perfectly distinct from it . Conceive
it a matter of indifference whether a rule of law


---page break---

Note

Appeal III . Remedia . the remedy they would propose.


---page break---

English practice Reports of decisions in Statute In England no sooner does a clause in a
Statute become the subject of decision , than the public
science
is <add>is loaded gratified are cursed science is loaded with a history of the arguments at
large in ten or twenty or thirty folio pages which are either
useless or of which the alteration of a single word in
the Statute would have superseded the use . And thus
the Statute — law instead of staying , serves only to
its encrease , the plague of Common Law. Yet even
this plague is a blessing in comparison of a set of unpublished decisions convertible into at the pleasure of any bookseller or of any note-holder ex-post-facto laws .
at the pleasure of any note-taker who happens finds motives to produce
them out of his


---page break---

<head><note>Ch E</note> Addition to nNote (g) to . 3 . being the last note</head>

Private interests would likewise interfere the decision
on in the business
with the decision , and shake the probity , or what would
be as bad the reputation for probity of those who were to
give it



Identifier: | JB/051/286/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

5

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

286

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

note

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16451

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in