JB/002/347/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/002/347/001: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
Created page with ''''[{{fullurl:JB/002/347/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> ''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet'' <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELO…'
 
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<note>33 Cause &amp;c</note><lb/>


The 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> and last of the causes  that have been mentioned <note>16 continued</note><lb/>
as appearing to concurr in the production of<lb/>
the <sic>depretiation</sic> in question are is the <del><gap/> note</del> quality<lb/>
of the instrument in respect of its sensible proerties:<lb/>
- the bulk and thickness of the paper. <del>In</del> A Bank<lb/>
note is <add>perhaps</add> in respect of both these properties is <gap/><lb/>
for circulation as can be imagined.  In point of<lb/>
size <add>and thickness</add> neither so large as to take up an inconvenient<lb/>
quantity of room in the pocket or pocket-bok, not even<lb/>
when a considerable number <add>are taken</add> together <del>are</del> nor yet<add>on the other hand</add> so<lb/>
small as to be liable to escape notice and be lost: in<lb/>
point<add>respect</add> of thickness while by reason of its<add>the</add> extraordinary<lb/>
thickness of the papers (besides <add>which the principal object</add>be being so much better<lb/>
guarded against fraudulent alteration which is the principal<lb/>
object) it is the  <del>more capable</del> better adapted to bear<lb/>
folding <add>to reduce it to</add>into a compass fit for the pocket and pocket<lb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 08:53, 19 May 2016

Click Here To Edit

33 Cause &c

The 4th and last of the causes that have been mentioned 16 continued
as appearing to concurr in the production of
the depretiation in question are is the note quality
of the instrument in respect of its sensible proerties:
- the bulk and thickness of the paper. In A Bank
note is perhaps in respect of both these properties is
for circulation as can be imagined. In point of
size and thickness neither so large as to take up an inconvenient
quantity of room in the pocket or pocket-bok, not even
when a considerable number are taken together are nor yeton the other hand so
small as to be liable to escape notice and be lost: in
pointrespect of thickness while by reason of itsthe extraordinary
thickness of the papers (besides which the principal objectbe being so much better
guarded against fraudulent alteration which is the principal
object) it is the more capable better adapted to bear
folding to reduce it tointo a compass fit for the pocket and pocket

Metadata:JB/002/347/001

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in