JB/070/079/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/079/001: Difference between revisions

TimCauser (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TimCauser (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
<add>with greater certainty than would otherwise be done</add>  <del><gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>
<add>with greater certainty than would otherwise be done</add>  <del><gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>
the limits of <del>the repealments</del> <add>its operation</add></p>
the limits of <del>the repealments</del> <add>its operation</add></p>
<p>But indeed according to out plan, nothing<lb/>
less than a whole Section will need to be got<lb/>
rid of in the way of express repealment any<lb/>
<del>less decision</del> <add><gap/> or</add> Number of Articles being cleared away<lb/>
by <gap/> omitting them in a new edition of<lb/>
the Section to which they belong</p>
<pb/>
<head>COMPOSITION Statutes Singly - quâ Statutes.<lb/>
Omission of Preambles to Repeal 9 - ments</head>
<pb/>
<pb/>





Revision as of 07:56, 6 October 2010

Click Here To Edit

9 Omission, of Preambles to Repealments

To Laws enacting, a short Preamble indicating
the end may sometimes be of use, as serving
for a clue to the interpretation of what is enacted:
To Laws repealing, they must in general be
superfluous, for this plain reason, because
there is nothing to interpret. If there be any
case in which this holds not good, it is in
that of a clause complicated with others
The language The end of the repeal declared and brought into into may
view by a short preamble may serve to determine
with greater certainty than would otherwise be done
the limits of the repealments its operation

But indeed according to out plan, nothing
less than a whole Section will need to be got
rid of in the way of express repealment any
less decision or Number of Articles being cleared away
by omitting them in a new edition of
the Section to which they belong


---page break---
COMPOSITION Statutes Singly - quâ Statutes.
Omission of Preambles to Repeal 9 - ments

---page break---

---page break---




Identifier: | JB/070/079/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

9

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

079

Info in main headings field

composition statutes singly qua statutes omission of preambles to repealments

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23194

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in