JB/107/286/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:10, 3 April 2013

much the stronger ground and greater
use for censure.

But in this code of self stiled moral
and political Philosophy might be seen
a well stocked repository of vulgar and
pernicious errors - of errors no less vulgar
than pernicious.

"For" (continues he) "if judgment of
"death were reserved for one or two species
"of crimes only, which would probably be
"the case if that judgment was intended
"to be executed without exception crimes
"might occur of the most dangerous
"example, and accompanied with circumstances "of heinous aggravation
"which did not fall within "any" description
"of offences that the laws had made
"capital, and which consequently could
"not receive the punishment their own
"malignity and public safety required."

Thus for the Reverend Doctor — still
the same petitiones principii; still the
same

Identifier: \| JB/107/286/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	107	Main Headings	law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net)
Folio number	286	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner		Watermarks	[[watermarks::[simplified hanoverian royal arms] 1821]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1821
Notes public		ID Number	35277
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-much the stronger ground and greater<lb/>use for censure.<lb/><lb/>But in this code of self <sic>stiled</sic> moral<lb/>and political Philosophy might be seen<lb/>a well stocked repository of vulgar and<lb/>pernicious errors - of errors no less vulgar<lb/>than pernicious.<lb/><lb/>"For" (continues he) "if judgment of<lb/>"death were reserved for one or two species<lb/>"of crimes only, which would probably be<lb/>"the case if that judgment was intended<lb/>"to be executed without exception crimes<lb/>"might occur of the most dangerous<lb/>"example, and accompanied with cir-<lb/>"cumstances of heinous aggravation<lb/>"which did not fall within "<hi rend='underline'>any</hi>" description<lb/>"of offences that the laws had made<lb/>"capital, and which consequently could<lb/>"not receive the punishment their own<lb/>"malignity and public safety requires."<lb/><lb/>Thus for the Reverend Doctor -- still<lb/>the same petitiones principii; still the<lb/>same
+<p>much the stronger ground and greater<lb/>use for censure.</p>
+<p>But in this code of self <sic>stiled</sic> moral<lb/> and political Philosophy might be seen<lb/> a well stocked repository of vulgar and<lb/> pernicious errors - of errors no less vulgar<lb/> than pernicious.</p>
+<p>"For" (continues he) "if judgment of<lb/> "death were reserved for one or two species<lb/> "of crimes only, which would probably be<lb/> "the case if that judgment was intended<lb/> "to be executed without exception crimes<lb/> "might occur of the most dangerous<lb/> "example, and accompanied with circumstances "of heinous aggravation<lb/> "which did not fall within "<hi rend='underline'>any</hi>" description<lb/> "of offences that the laws had made<lb/> "capital, and which consequently could<lb/> "not receive the punishment their own<lb/> "malignity and public safety required."</p>
+<p>Thus for the Reverend Doctor &#x2014; still<lb/> the same <foreign>petitiones principii</foreign>; still the<lb/> <add>same
+</add></p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Views

JB/107/286/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:10, 3 April 2013

Navigation

Search