JB/041/111/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/041/111/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
is <gap/><add>more</add> probable, in so far as they  think <add>as</add>proper to<lb/>
is <gap/><add>more</add> probable, in so far as they  think <add>as</add>proper to<lb/>
be so guided<lb/></p>
be so guided<lb/></p>
<p>2 Allowing<add>Allotting</add> to the Jury<add>Quasi Jury</add> by law in express terms,<lb/>
and thence with<add>more comparativeness and more constant</add> -surer effect the several functions herein<lb/>
designated by the  a several adjuncts auditors, inb<gap/>tive,<lb/>
and consonant, and with more <unclear>composition</unclear> effect than has<lb/>
place in the case of a<add>the</add> Jury.<lb/></p>
<p>3. Stating in express terms the notion of the explanations<lb/>
expected at the hands of the Judge for the use of the<lb/>
Quasi Jury as also for the use of the<add>others</add> herein-after members<lb/>
of the Public Opinion Tribunal.<lb/></p>





Revision as of 13:22, 24 June 2013

'Click Here To Edit

1823. August Sept.3
Constitutional Code

IV. Features, supposed apt, which not being found in the Jury
System are here, in the Quasi-Jury systems introduced.

So far as they have correspondent and opposite features in
the Quasi Jury system then have been already mentioned

1. Division of the every Quasi Jury into two sections: 1 the
more erudite: 2. the more popular: the more erudite: the more
popular the more numerous, than in case of disagreement the
work of thethose who belong to more numerous section may preponderate over the
will of the less those who belong to the most less numerous
section. the more those who belong toerudite section introduced that by the
influence of stronger understanding over understanding, then
who may be supposedpositive to result in inaffectual aptitude.
in whose intellectual aptitude may be refracted very guide
than who in whom appropriate moral aptitude
is more probable, in so far as they think asproper to
be so guided

2 AllowingAllotting to the JuryQuasi Jury by law in express terms,
and thence withmore comparativeness and more constant -surer effect the several functions herein
designated by the a several adjuncts auditors, inbtive,
and consonant, and with more composition effect than has
place in the case of athe Jury.

3. Stating in express terms the notion of the explanations
expected at the hands of the Judge for the use of the
Quasi Jury as also for the use of theothers herein-after members
of the Public Opinion Tribunal.





Identifier: | JB/041/111/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 41.

Date_1

1823-09-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

27-32

Box

041

Main Headings

Constitutional Code

Folio number

111

Info in main headings field

Constitutional Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D9 / E1

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1822

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in