JB/073/041/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/073/041/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/073/041/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/073/041/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>LARCENY.</head>
 
<head>ANOMALOUS DOCTRINE RESTRICTIVE <hi rend='superscript'>1</hi></head>
 
<p><note>If we <add>now</add> measure the amplitude of the excepted members of these capricious divisions, by applying to them <add>them to</add> the celebrated natural division into the 3 <unclear>grand</unclear> classes or Kingdoms as they are called the Animal, the vegetable and the Mineral</note> If after<lb/>
any one thinks it is <sic>compleat</sic>: <note>There is nothing here of a base nature but the intellects of <add>certain</add> Lawyers, who destituted <add>themselves</add> of all natural knowledge &amp; ignorant of <sic>it's</sic> value, <add>have</add> refused the protection of the Law for their property to men <add>more</add> better deserving <add>of</add> it than themselves.</note> he will find himself very much disappointed: so true it is that<lb/>
voluminousness in Jurisprudence is a thing very different <add>distinct</add> from <add>&amp; often opposite to universality of comprehension either accuracy or comprehension.</add> perfection</p>
 
<p><note>The most voluminous laws are not the most <sic>compleat</sic>.</note> So far are all the offences <del>from</del> that come properly under this title <add>of Larceny</add> from having their<lb/>
punishments duly adjusted, that there <hi rend='underline'>many <sic>thing</sic></hi> <add>is got a great multitude of very valuable articles</add> the stealing of which <add>is nor</add> under any<lb/>
circumstances deemed Larceny at all:</p>
 





Revision as of 13:40, 15 June 2012

Click Here To Edit

LARCENY.

ANOMALOUS DOCTRINE RESTRICTIVE 1

If we now measure the amplitude of the excepted members of these capricious divisions, by applying to them them to the celebrated natural division into the 3 grand classes or Kingdoms as they are called the Animal, the vegetable and the Mineral If after
any one thinks it is compleat: There is nothing here of a base nature but the intellects of certain Lawyers, who destituted themselves of all natural knowledge & ignorant of it's value, have refused the protection of the Law for their property to men more better deserving of it than themselves. he will find himself very much disappointed: so true it is that
voluminousness in Jurisprudence is a thing very different distinct from & often opposite to universality of comprehension either accuracy or comprehension. perfection

The most voluminous laws are not the most compleat. So far are all the offences from that come properly under this title of Larceny from having their
punishments duly adjusted, that there many thing is got a great multitude of very valuable articles the stealing of which is nor under any
circumstances deemed Larceny at all:




Identifier: | JB/073/041/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

[[marginal_summary_numbering::[1]]]

Box

073

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

041

Info in main headings field

larceny anomalous doctrine restrictive

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

cc1

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23881

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in