JB/002/105/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/002/105/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


<head>II continued</head>
<head>II continued</head>
<p>
 
<p>In a general point of view, each note may be considered<lb/> as divisible of being in fact <del>intend</del> contrived <lb/>for the purpose of being <del>occasionally</del> <add>eventually</add> divided of into <lb/>two parts: an. <add>viz:</add> the Upper part as Head Piece: <del>as</del> <add>and</add> the <lb/>Tail  <del>piece</del> or Body piece: which division <add>is</add> <del>appears</del> <lb/>accordingly <add>made to apply</add> to the Back part as well as to the Front<lb/> part of the Note.</p> 





Revision as of 18:49, 25 June 2013

Click Here To Edit

Empl.

II continued

In a general point of view, each note may be considered
as divisible of being in fact intend contrived
for the purpose of being occasionally eventually divided of into
two parts: an. viz: the Upper part as Head Piece: as and the
Tail piece or Body piece: which division is appears
accordingly made to apply to the Back part as well as to the Front
part of the Note.



































































































Metadata:JB/002/105/001

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in