★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/010/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/096/010/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --><head>To be copied where no red line drawn through</head><lb/>When Divines talk of a state of Nature, they<lb/>mean by it that State <del>or condition</del> in which<lb/>they <del><unclear>generally</unclear></del><add>suppose <del><gap/></del> the generality of</add> Mankind to have been before<lb/>the prosaic Dispensation, <gap/> in which they<lb/>suppose that part of Mankind still <del>to be</del> <add>continue,</add><lb/>to whom the Mosaic of Christian dispensations<lb/>are known. <del>But was it <gap/></del> <add><hi rend='underline'>allowable</hi></add><lb/><del>in our author to use the term in his<lb/></del>But our author cannot have used the term in this<lb/><del>sense: can it</del><add>sense because in this sense it cannot</add>with any propriety be<lb/>applied <del>in this sense</del> in a Treatise<lb/>on Jurisprudence. <add>How so? Does the Author never<lb/>use his <gap/> in any<lb/>sense but the proper one?</add> When Lawyers talk<lb/>of a state of Nature,if they mean any<lb/>thing by it, they must mean that state<lb/><del>or condition</del>in which men existed before their entrance into Society: <add>or which is the same thing</add>before their<lb/>submission to <del>any</del>positive Laws.<lb/>Now<lb/><pb/>Note<lb/>*"When Society is once formed <del>Society</del>Government<lb/>results<lb/>(6)(25) | ||
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet'' | ''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet'' | ||
Click Here To Edit
To be copied where no red line drawn through
When Divines talk of a state of Nature, they
mean by it that State or condition in which
they generallysuppose the generality of Mankind to have been before
the prosaic Dispensation, in which they
suppose that part of Mankind still to be continue,
to whom the Mosaic of Christian dispensations
are known. But was it allowable
in our author to use the term in his
But our author cannot have used the term in this
sense: can itsense because in this sense it cannotwith any propriety be
applied in this sense in a Treatise
on Jurisprudence. How so? Does the Author never
use his in any
sense but the proper one? When Lawyers talk
of a state of Nature,if they mean any
thing by it, they must mean that state
or conditionin which men existed before their entrance into Society: or which is the same thingbefore their
submission to anypositive Laws.
Now
---page break---
Note
*"When Society is once formed SocietyGovernment
results
(6)(25)
This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet
|
Identifier: | JB/096/010/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
|
010 |
|||
|
001 |
note / note |
||
|
collectanea |
4 |
||
|
recto |
c25 / c26 / c27 / c28 |
||
|
168 |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown] [lion with crown motif]]] |
||
|
[[notes_public::"to be copied where no red line drawn through" [note not in bentham's hand]]] |
31014 |
||
