JB/002/506/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/002/506/002: Difference between revisions

Robmagin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Robmagin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<p>"Nr 39, M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Poores account" Before I enter into the parti-<lb/>-culars of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Poores account, it may be necessary to observe that<lb/> I did require particulars from him, but observing at the same time<lb/> that "he best knew what would required" this I supposed he would<lb/> be well acquainted with, in consequence of his frequent mercantile<lb/> transaction with the <unclear>Noz</unclear>; &amp; I have all along held up to him<lb/> that the <unclear>noz</unclear> would have to examine there accounts, &amp; they they<lb/> would probably be scrutinized with an unusual degree of at ten-<lb/>tion</p>
<p>"Nr 39, M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Poores account" Before I enter into the parti-<lb/>-culars of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Poores account, it may be necessary to observe that<lb/> I did require particulars from him, but observing at the same time<lb/> that "he best knew what would required" this I supposed he would<lb/> be well acquainted with, in consequence of his frequent mercantile<lb/> transaction with the <unclear>Noz</unclear>; &amp; I have all along held up to him<lb/> that the <unclear>noz</unclear> would have to examine there accounts, &amp; they they<lb/> would probably be scrutinized with an unusual degree of at ten-<lb/>tion</p>
<p>Article 4 "leach paid" I <del><gap/></del> request an explanation of the <unclear>Ntz</unclear> obser<lb/>vations on this head, as I am at a loss to make up any num<lb/> of the amount of 266.11.2 for which no services are mentioned.</p>
<p>Article 4 "leach paid" I <del><gap/></del> request an explanation of the <unclear>Ntz</unclear> obser<lb/>vations on this head, as I am at a loss to make up any num<lb/> of the amount of 266.11.2 for which no services are mentioned.</p>
<p>A5 "Wages" The particulars are now specified, but I must observe<lb/> that the rate of payment way very much enhanced, by</p>
<p>A5 "Wages" The particulars are now specified, but I must observe<lb/> that the rate of payment way very much enhanced, by the<lb/> difficulties made in the <unclear>Sy</unclear> to the lending of there man of the<lb/> outlet of the barrack, <del>which <gap/></del> these men thought<lb/> themselves justified in refusing to work at Redbridge for less<lb/> than the exorbitant sum of 9 shillings per day.</p>
 
<p>Article, "7 to 11 inclusive. These charges I myself thought exorbitant<lb/> &amp; took no small pains to induce Mr Poore to diminish them but<lb/> without effect. Mr Poore alleges that they are <add>made</add> at a rate similar to what<lb/> other merchants &amp; builders would have charged; &amp; I must confess that there seems<lb/> reason upon examination into the prices paid by Government for the<lb/> building  &amp; repairs of vessels to believe that the profits of individuals<lb/> cannot in many instances have been less.</p>
 
<p>No 40. Richard </p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 23:25, 8 August 2013

Click Here To Edit

ton in the bin; the labour & we of the premiers are charged at a rate
very much below the ordinary rate of payment— the total rate
per ton of the vessel produced is a vessel very well able
to carry guns which will make it equal in force to any of the
gun brigs, though this vessel (including the £50 unnecessary pounds) comes
to nor more than £ per ton.

"Nr 39, Mr Poores account" Before I enter into the parti-
-culars of Mr Poores account, it may be necessary to observe that
I did require particulars from him, but observing at the same time
that "he best knew what would required" this I supposed he would
be well acquainted with, in consequence of his frequent mercantile
transaction with the Noz; & I have all along held up to him
that the noz would have to examine there accounts, & they they
would probably be scrutinized with an unusual degree of at ten-
tion

Article 4 "leach paid" I request an explanation of the Ntz obser
vations on this head, as I am at a loss to make up any num
of the amount of 266.11.2 for which no services are mentioned.

A5 "Wages" The particulars are now specified, but I must observe
that the rate of payment way very much enhanced, by the
difficulties made in the Sy to the lending of there man of the
outlet of the barrack, which these men thought
themselves justified in refusing to work at Redbridge for less
than the exorbitant sum of 9 shillings per day.

Article, "7 to 11 inclusive. These charges I myself thought exorbitant
& took no small pains to induce Mr Poore to diminish them but
without effect. Mr Poore alleges that they are made at a rate similar to what
other merchants & builders would have charged; & I must confess that there seems
reason upon examination into the prices paid by Government for the
building & repairs of vessels to believe that the profits of individuals
cannot in many instances have been less.

No 40. Richard



Identifier: | JB/002/506/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 2.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

2

Box

002

Main Headings

Annuity Notes

Folio number

506

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

A2 / F2

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::I TAYLOR [top of 1795]]]

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Evan Nepean

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1795

Notes public

ID Number

1245

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in