JB/096/025/001

Click Here To Edit

To be copied of not acting. For notwithstanding
our author's absurd strange definition of
the word obligation, yet however admidst different all the various scares
in which Authors have used that
term, They have always supposed it
to ha imply this power.

This first absurdityinconsequence therefore was to is confounding
confound the idea of Law with that of
the principles imprest upon Master.
For these all idea of obligation, all
idea of motives is excluded. —
This next absurdity inconsequence is talking of
a Law of Nature. There is no such
thing. When was this Law notified?
it cannot be notified: for the
term nature is taken for the
Author of Nature, for the Creator
of the Universe: how should he notify
this Law, it would cease to be the
law of Nature: it would become
a part of the Law of Revelation. &

22 70

Identifier: | JB/096/025/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	096	Main Headings	comment on the commentaries
Folio number	025	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	collectanea	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c70
Penner	168	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[quartered royal arms motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public	[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]	ID Number	31029
Box Contents