★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto upload |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
''This | <head>Marginal Contents (7<lb/>Connects Grounds of rejection</head><lb/><p> Grounds of rejection </p> <add> Economy</add> <lb/> 13 <lb/> Supposing th least <lb/> expensive of the two <lb/> 13 to 1 to be too expensive <lb/> for a fair<lb/> sample by half so <lb/> much more still <lb/>the inferiority in <lb/> point of economy as <lb/> compared with Panopticon<lb/> is stupendous.</p><p> 14 <lb/> Nature of the County <lb/> Jail is improvements <lb/> compared wit the <lb/> <sic>expence.</sic> </p><p> 15 <lb/> King's mode of making <lb/> out the superior <lb/> economy of the <lb/> County Jail system <lb/> is by considering the <lb/> <sic>expence</sic> of that as <lb/> nothing because <lb/> not borne by the Government. </p><p> 16 <lb/> King reason for <lb/> considering the <sic>expence</sic><lb/> as nothing <lb/> is that the task <lb/> of finding money <lb/< for it would not <lb/> press upon him <lb/> or his.</p> <p> 17 <lb/> Obstacle to King's <lb/> economy the Acts of <lb/> Parliament 34.G.3 <lb/> c.84 and 39.G.3.c </p> <p> 18 <lb/> But this was got <lb/> rid of by the Duke's <lb/> legislative power. </p><!-- text in column 2 is added in a different ink and has been crossed through in pencil--> <p> N.S.Wales </p> <p> The <gap/> of N.S. Wales <lb/>supposing it was so <lb/> much improved affords <lb/> us argument for relinquishing <lb/> <gap/> but on <lb/> <del> the supposition </del> <add> as far as <del> <gap/> <gap/> </del> <lb/> would be more conducive <lb/> to this common <lb/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> & them that <lb/> and <gap/> together. <lb/> But <gap/> it is not so <lb/> <unclear>insincere</unclear> as <gap/> <lb/> <gap/> <lb/>1. Example. Prevention <lb/> of <gap/> officers on <lb/> <del> 2. The Formation</del> the part of <gap/> <lb/> <del>3. Economy</del> <lb/> 2. Reformation. <gap/> <lb/> of future offences <lb/> on the part of the transported <lb/> Convicts. </p> <p> 3. <del> Economy </del> Compensation <lb/> for damage when <lb/> by the officers committed <lb/> to Economy of the establishment. <lb/> II It would <gap/> follow <lb/> that if N.S. Wales <del> gap/> </del> <lb/> kept up <gap/> should <lb/> be grown up because <gap/> by cancellation could be <lb/> a spur to good management </lb> in N.S. Wales. </p><p> The question examined <lb/> 1. On <gap/> <lb/> 2. On practice. </p> <p> It not only is not <lb/> improved to <del> any met</del> <add> the </add> <lb/> purpose of the argument <lb/> but they themselves did <lb/> not believe it to be for <lb/> 1. They never gave in <lb/> a Part<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <gap/> accounts <lb/> of it<lb/> 2. Thought called for by <lb/> Finance Committee <lb/> 3. Other members knew <lb/> their <gap/> and durst <lb/> <gap/> <gap/> for those accounts. <lb/> It would have been <lb/> hastily. </p> <p> 4. Every <gap/> <gap/> of <lb/> this weakness of his argument<lb/> by their <gap/> the argument from <gap/> <lb/> before it. </p> <p> two points considered <lb/> 1 - Abstract utility. <lb/> 2. Bona fides whether <lb/> they really believed in <lb/> it </p> <p> In regard to economy <lb/> It is not enough though <lb/> it should be improved <lb/> if not improved to <del> fin</del><lb/> a degree equal to <gap/></p><pb/><p> Grounds of rejection</p> <p> 1<lb/> 4 - Grounds of relinquishment <lb/> New <lb/> South Wales. <lb/> This the best place <lb/> to fetch false excuses <lb/> from as being the <lb/> most distant and <lb/> out of sight. </p> <p> 2. <hi rend="superscript">1</hi> <lb/> For the purpose of <lb/> the argument no <lb/> matter what the <lb/> state of that colony <lb/> really was - but <lb/> what they thought <lb/> it. </p> <p>3. <lb/> That they thought <lb/> it bad, appears <lb/> from their never <lb/> daring to publish <lb/> any accounts of it - <lb/> though so strongly <lb/> urged by the Finance <lb/> Committee - </p><p> 4 <lb/> While L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Belgrave was <lb/> propagating the <lb/> Gospel the conspiracy, <lb/> at the instigation <lb/> of L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Belgrave <lb/> was propagating <lb/> immorality in New<lb/> South Wales. </p><p>5 <lb/> The immorality is <lb/> here annihilated <lb/> by keeping it out <lb/> of sight as the bad <lb/> economy in the case <lb/> of the Jails. </p> <pb/> <p> Grounds of rejection</p> <p> 1<lb/> 5 Increase of terms - <lb/> comparison of this <lb/> Minute q13th August <lb/> with that of 14th July <lb/> 1800 - the term proposed <lb/> being preserved - </p> <p> 2. <lb/> Could not Long have <lb/> proposed decreased <lb/> ones? <lb/> he did not propose <lb/> even the original ones. <lb/> If he had the <lb/> pretence for "<hi rend="underline">relinquishment</hi>" <lb/> would <lb/> not have stood.</p> <p>1 <lb/> Suppression of King's <lb/> letter of 28<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> July 1800 <lb/> - a proof of its not <lb/> being fit to be seen. </p><p> 2. <lb/> The suppression dates <lb/> in Addington's time. </p> <p> 3<lb/> Consciousness of the <lb/> frivoousness of these <lb/> last arguments <lb/>proved by their being <lb/> ranked behind the <lb/> argument from <lb/> delay. </p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
Marginal Contents (7
Connects Grounds of rejection
Grounds of rejection
Economy
13
Supposing th least
expensive of the two
13 to 1 to be too expensive
for a fair
sample by half so
much more still
the inferiority in
point of economy as
compared with Panopticon
is stupendous.
14
Nature of the County
Jail is improvements
compared wit the
expence.
15
King's mode of making
out the superior
economy of the
County Jail system
is by considering the
expence of that as
nothing because
not borne by the Government.
16
King reason for
considering the expence
as nothing
is that the task
of finding money <lb/< for it would not
press upon him
or his.
17
Obstacle to King's
economy the Acts of
Parliament 34.G.3
c.84 and 39.G.3.c
18
But this was got
rid of by the Duke's
legislative power.
N.S.Wales
The of N.S. Wales
supposing it was so
much improved affords
us argument for relinquishing
but on
the supposition as far as
would be more conducive
to this common
& them that
and together.
But it is not so
insincere as
1. Example. Prevention
of officers on
2. The Formation the part of
3. Economy
2. Reformation.
of future offences
on the part of the transported
Convicts.
3. Economy Compensation
for damage when
by the officers committed
to Economy of the establishment.
II It would follow
that if N.S. Wales gap/>
kept up should
be grown up because by cancellation could be
a spur to good management </lb> in N.S. Wales.
The question examined
1. On
2. On practice.
It not only is not
improved to any met <add> the
purpose of the argument
but they themselves did
not believe it to be for
1. They never gave in
a Partr accounts
of it
2. Thought called for by
Finance Committee
3. Other members knew
their and durst
for those accounts.
It would have been
hastily.
4. Every of
this weakness of his argument
by their the argument from
before it.
two points considered
1 - Abstract utility.
2. Bona fides whether
they really believed in
it
In regard to economy
It is not enough though
it should be improved
if not improved to fin
a degree equal to
---page break---
Grounds of rejection
1
4 - Grounds of relinquishment
New
South Wales.
This the best place
to fetch false excuses
from as being the
most distant and
out of sight.
2. 1
For the purpose of
the argument no
matter what the
state of that colony
really was - but
what they thought
it.
3.
That they thought
it bad, appears
from their never
daring to publish
any accounts of it -
though so strongly
urged by the Finance
Committee -
4
While Ld Belgrave was
propagating the
Gospel the conspiracy,
at the instigation
of Ld Belgrave
was propagating
immorality in New
South Wales.
5
The immorality is
here annihilated
by keeping it out
of sight as the bad
economy in the case
of the Jails.
---page break---
Grounds of rejection
1
5 Increase of terms -
comparison of this
Minute q13th August
with that of 14th July
1800 - the term proposed
being preserved -
2.
Could not Long have
proposed decreased
ones?
he did not propose
even the original ones.
If he had the
pretence for "relinquishment"
would
not have stood.
1
Suppression of King's
letter of 28th July 1800
- a proof of its not
being fit to be seen.
2.
The suppression dates
in Addington's time.
3
Consciousness of the
frivoousness of these
last arguments
proved by their being
ranked behind the
argument from
delay.
|
Identifier: | JB/121/015/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-2, 1-18, 1-5, 1-3 |
|||
|
121 |
Panopticon |
||
|
015 |
Marginal Contents Grounds of rejection Connectg Observs |
||
|
003 |
|||
|
Marginal summary sheet |
2 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
A7 / F7 |
||
|
CW 1799 |
|||
|
C. Abbit Lees |
|||
|
1799 |
|||
|
003 |
|||
