JB/096/056/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/096/056/004: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/056/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/056/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


under construction ...
<head>12</head>
<p>intimated to us if these spurious rules and precepts
<lb/>
whereby to distinguish them from the genuine.  I would
<lb/>
not be sure whether the epithet "abstracted" was
<lb/>
given them for that purpose : considering that how
<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>abstractedness</hi> should be the exclusive property of
<lb/>
these spurious ones in contradistinction to such as are
<lb/>
genuine is not easy to conceive, to those who
<lb/>
like Locke , know what they mean by it.  All
<lb/>
I can say is, if not for that purpose , I know not
<lb/>
for what other. <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> <note>[+] Not that it is any great matter neither what the <del><gap/></del> <add>spurious</add> are, while the genuine are <del><gap/></del> <add>necessarily</add> conformed to , and as necessarily followed by the happiness they have in view.</note>
<lb/></p>
<p>These are the people , who prove to you that
<lb/>
a thing <del>ought</del> is commanded by the Law of
<lb/>
Nature (or which is the same thing with them,
<lb/>
ought to be done) because it is <hi rend='underline'>fit</hi> it should be
<lb/>
done: that is becasue it <hi rend='underline'>ought</hi>: referring according
<lb/>
<del>to the <gap/></del> our Author's account of them <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note>+ as our Author tells us</note> "merely
<lb/>
to the fitness or unfitness of things" : unreasonable
<lb/>
<gap/> , who <gap/> a going a <gap/> of their own
<lb/>
for identical propositions , regardless of the exclusive
<lb/>
privilege the Auther <del>is entitled</del> <add>entitles himself</add> to, by the
<lb/>
superior polish he knows <sic>hes</sic><!-- should be, he's (I think) --> to put upon his
<lb/>
works for that sort of manufacture.
<lb/></p>
<p><del>Over such same <gap/> as he calls them</del> <add>Here our &#x2014; author carries an eye of <gap/></add>
<lb/>
<del>the Author <gap/></del> <add><del>exalts</del></add> <del>with a generous <del>disdain</del> <add>complacency over his own labour's , measures</add>
<lb/>
The difference between his and theirs , and <del><gap/></del> <add>exalts</add>
<lb/>
with a generous disdain over those
<lb/>
"vain surmizers".  <del>I then Pity <gap/> been, <gap/></del> <add><del><gap/></del></add> <add>merits</add> 
<lb/></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 13:59, 18 April 2011

Click Here To Edit


under construction ...

12

intimated to us if these spurious rules and precepts
whereby to distinguish them from the genuine. I would
not be sure whether the epithet "abstracted" was
given them for that purpose : considering that how
abstractedness should be the exclusive property of
these spurious ones in contradistinction to such as are
genuine is not easy to conceive, to those who
like Locke , know what they mean by it. All
I can say is, if not for that purpose , I know not
for what other. [+] [+] Not that it is any great matter neither what the spurious are, while the genuine are necessarily conformed to , and as necessarily followed by the happiness they have in view.

These are the people , who prove to you that
a thing ought is commanded by the Law of
Nature (or which is the same thing with them,
ought to be done) because it is fit it should be
done: that is becasue it ought: referring according
to the our Author's account of them + + as our Author tells us "merely
to the fitness or unfitness of things" : unreasonable
, who a going a of their own
for identical propositions , regardless of the exclusive
privilege the Auther is entitled entitles himself to, by the
superior polish he knows hes to put upon his
works for that sort of manufacture.

Over such same as he calls them Here our — author carries an eye of
the Author exalts with a generous disdain complacency over his own labour's , measures
The difference between his and theirs , and exalts
with a generous disdain over those
"vain surmizers". I then Pity been, merits



Identifier: | JB/096/056/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

056

Info in main headings field

law of nature

Image

004

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f9 / d10 / f11 / d12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31060

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in