JB/050/166/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/050/166/002: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


<note>Pauper. <lb/> A person to be admitted to sue in <lb/><foreign>forma pauperis</foreign>, is forced to swear <lb/>to his not having a sum, much <lb/>less commonly than that, after all <lb/>the indulgences given him, in that <lb/>which is necessary to carry on his <lb/>cause.</note>
<note>Pauper. <lb/> A person to be admitted to sue in <lb/><foreign>forma pauperis</foreign>, is forced to swear <lb/>to his not having a sum, much <lb/>less commonly than that, after all <lb/>the indulgences given him, in that <lb/>which is necessary to carry on his <lb/>cause.</note>
<p>The policy should be to throw the whole Load of the expence upon the Party in the wrong <add> <gap/></add> <lb/><add>equally</add> discouraging <add>by that means the</add> <add>the spirit of</add> vexation in <sic>Ptffs</sic>, and that of obstinacy &amp; Chicanery in Defendants. </p>
<p>The policy should be to throw the whole Load of the expence upon the Party in the wrong <add> miscarrying</add> <lb/><add>equally</add> discouraging <add>by that means the</add> <add>the spirit of</add> vexation in <sic>Ptffs</sic>, and that of obstinacy &amp; Chicanery in Defendants. </p>


<head>2</head>
<head>2</head>
Line 17: Line 17:


<head>4</head>
<head>4</head>
<p>By this means the Burthen on the party miscarrying will bear the like kind of proportion <lb/>to the Value in litigation as it does at present: and it is necessary it should do <unclear>so</unclear> <lb/>for if the p<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Centage were to be the same let that Value be ever so great, either that <lb/>p<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Centage must be be small as to be no object, or when that Value was great, <del>Def</del> <gap/> <add><gap/></add> <gap/><!-- words truncated --> <lb/>miscarrying would be ruined, <del>without having</del> <add>before they could</add>
<p>By this means the Burthen on the party miscarrying will bear the like kind of proportion <lb/>to the Value in litigation as it does at present: and it is necessary it should do <unclear>so</unclear> <lb/>for if the p<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Centage were to be the same let that Value be ever so great, either that <lb/>p<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Centage must be be small as to be no object, or when that Value was great, <del>Def</del> <gap/> <add><gap/></add> <!-- words truncated --> <lb/>miscarrying would be ruined, <del>without having</del> <add>before they could</add> have wherewithal, to satisfy the imposition </p>
 
 


<head>5.</head>
<p>In such cases where on the present footing the Court thinks it expedient not to give <lb/>costs on either side, the p<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Centage would be to be divided. </p>





Revision as of 00:10, 6 September 2013

Click Here To Edit

1 Costs — Stamps — pr Centage, on Value 1

Pauper.
A person to be admitted to sue in
forma pauperis, is forced to swear
to his not having a sum, much
less commonly than that, after all
the indulgences given him, in that
which is necessary to carry on his
cause.

The policy should be to throw the whole Load of the expence upon the Party in the wrong miscarrying
equally discouraging by that means the the spirit of vexation in Ptffs, and that of obstinacy & Chicanery in Defendants.

2

On the present policy of the Assessment that Load is in the first instance equally distributed
on both Parties: and an expence of a magnitude to swallow up many a small
demand beco is a matter of absolute certainty, while success, (owing to the number of forms
obstacles against which the merits of a cause are liable to stumble) even tho' the matter of
right to be clear as well as the evidence compleat and unimpeachable, is at best but problematical.[+]
[+] even to person initiated, & still more
so to men at large, to whom the timing
of their danger are augmented by their
ignorance of it's nature.

3.

The Remedy for this seems to be, (if by all means for the sake of the Revenue Law
proceeding, are to be encumber'd) to take off the Stamp - duty upon the pieces, papers and
a pr Centage, of the Value of the thing sued for which as an Increment to be added at the end of the Suit to the Costs
of the Def: party miscarrying greater in proportion in small Sums, and decreasing as the value litigated
augments.—

4

By this means the Burthen on the party miscarrying will bear the like kind of proportion
to the Value in litigation as it does at present: and it is necessary it should do so
for if the pr Centage were to be the same let that Value be ever so great, either that
pr Centage must be be small as to be no object, or when that Value was great, Def
miscarrying would be ruined, without having before they could have wherewithal, to satisfy the imposition

5.

In such cases where on the present footing the Court thinks it expedient not to give
costs on either side, the pr Centage would be to be divided.























































































Identifier: | JB/050/166/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

166

Info in main headings field

procedure civil costs - stamps ad valorem

Image

002

Titles

costs - stamps - p. centage, on value / pauper

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

cc1

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16157

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in