JB/122/494/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/494/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<add> ff.4. (5)  + </add><p> 1. <hi rend="underline">Question 1.</hi> When, in relation to the Contract, the expectation<lb/>from Government <hi rend="underline">failed,</hi> and the terms <add> under</add> the several <hi rend="underline">Patents</hi> remained <lb/>as yet <hi rend="underline">unexpired</hi>, how happened it that you never took the benefit <lb/>of any of these inventions, in the way originally intended? </p> <p>For that you never did, is an averment included in the Statement<lb/>made by you, <del> as it were</del> in the terms of the Act of Parliament,<lb/> as above</p> <p> <hi rend="underline">Answer.</hi>  Never, <sic>till</sic> the passing of the above Act, <lb/>(At 1812) viz. long after the expiration of the latest of those patents, <lb/>has there been any <hi rend="underline">determinate</hi> point of time, at which my expectation<lb/> from government can be said to have altogether failed.</p><note>+ Mr Long, Treasury (speaking of a letter I have received from the + D. of Portland Secretary of State) to J. Bentham Esq. 25 March 1800</note><lb/><p> So late as in March 1800 <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> I was called upon, as will be seen, <lb/>by the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, after communication with <lb/>the Secretary of State to make preparation for no fewer than <lb/>2000 prisoners, being <hi rend="underline">double</hi> the number stipulated for in the <lb/>Contract.  Mean time, as early as in the year 1796, my above mentioned <lb/>brother (having, by his attendance in England on this <lb/>business, lost the honourable and beneficial situation he held under <lb/>the Russian Government, viz. the command of a regiment of <lb/>2000 men conferred on him for very signal service rendered in <lb/>the defence of that Empire <add> A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 1789</add> against a Turkish invasion, together with <lb/>the most flattering prospects of <sic>ulterior</sic> promotion)my Brother, I <lb/>say, partly for immediately assured subsistence in a married state, <lb/>animated moreover by the prospect of services to an unbounded <lb/>amount which he entertained hopes of being permitted to render <lb/> to government and the public in his own country - hopes <lb/>which have not been altogether disappointed - consented to engage <lb/>in the service of Government here, in anew office <lb/>created for that purpose, viz. that of <hi rend="underline">Inspector general of his</hi> <lb/><hi rend="underline">Majesty's Naval Works</hi>: from which period <add> (1796) </add> <sic>till</sic> a few weeks <lb/>ago, either in that office, or in the office of Commissioner of the Navy, every <lb/>moment of his time was devoted to that novel and most laborious duty: as <lb/>a list, which I have, of the services rendered by him in there his offices <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> will </p><note>+ S.B. Statement of Services, as above</note><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 10:28, 19 September 2013

'Click Here To Edit

ff.4. (5) +

1. Question 1. When, in relation to the Contract, the expectation
from Government failed, and the terms under the several Patents remained
as yet unexpired, how happened it that you never took the benefit
of any of these inventions, in the way originally intended?

For that you never did, is an averment included in the Statement
made by you, as it were in the terms of the Act of Parliament,
as above

Answer. Never, till the passing of the above Act,
(At 1812) viz. long after the expiration of the latest of those patents,
has there been any determinate point of time, at which my expectation
from government can be said to have altogether failed.

+ Mr Long, Treasury (speaking of a letter I have received from the + D. of Portland Secretary of State) to J. Bentham Esq. 25 March 1800

So late as in March 1800 + I was called upon, as will be seen,
by the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, after communication with
the Secretary of State to make preparation for no fewer than
2000 prisoners, being double the number stipulated for in the
Contract. Mean time, as early as in the year 1796, my above mentioned
brother (having, by his attendance in England on this
business, lost the honourable and beneficial situation he held under
the Russian Government, viz. the command of a regiment of
2000 men conferred on him for very signal service rendered in
the defence of that Empire Ao 1789 against a Turkish invasion, together with
the most flattering prospects of ulterior promotion)my Brother, I
say, partly for immediately assured subsistence in a married state,
animated moreover by the prospect of services to an unbounded
amount which he entertained hopes of being permitted to render
to government and the public in his own country - hopes
which have not been altogether disappointed - consented to engage
in the service of Government here, in anew office
created for that purpose, viz. that of Inspector general of his
Majesty's Naval Works: from which period (1796) till a few weeks
ago, either in that office, or in the office of Commissioner of the Navy, every
moment of his time was devoted to that novel and most laborious duty: as
a list, which I have, of the services rendered by him in there his offices + will

+ S.B. Statement of Services, as above


Identifier: | JB/122/494/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

494

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

F13 / F14

Penner

Watermarks

JOHN DICKINSON & Co 1809

Marginals

Paper Producer

A. Levy

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1809

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in