★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto upload |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
' | <add> ff.4. (5) + </add><p> 1. <hi rend="underline">Question 1.</hi> When, in relation to the Contract, the expectation<lb/>from Government <hi rend="underline">failed,</hi> and the terms <add> under</add> the several <hi rend="underline">Patents</hi> remained <lb/>as yet <hi rend="underline">unexpired</hi>, how happened it that you never took the benefit <lb/>of any of these inventions, in the way originally intended? </p> <p>For that you never did, is an averment included in the Statement<lb/>made by you, <del> as it were</del> in the terms of the Act of Parliament,<lb/> as above</p> <p> <hi rend="underline">Answer.</hi> Never, <sic>till</sic> the passing of the above Act, <lb/>(At 1812) viz. long after the expiration of the latest of those patents, <lb/>has there been any <hi rend="underline">determinate</hi> point of time, at which my expectation<lb/> from government can be said to have altogether failed.</p><note>+ Mr Long, Treasury (speaking of a letter I have received from the + D. of Portland Secretary of State) to J. Bentham Esq. 25 March 1800</note><lb/><p> So late as in March 1800 <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> I was called upon, as will be seen, <lb/>by the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, after communication with <lb/>the Secretary of State to make preparation for no fewer than <lb/>2000 prisoners, being <hi rend="underline">double</hi> the number stipulated for in the <lb/>Contract. Mean time, as early as in the year 1796, my above mentioned <lb/>brother (having, by his attendance in England on this <lb/>business, lost the honourable and beneficial situation he held under <lb/>the Russian Government, viz. the command of a regiment of <lb/>2000 men conferred on him for very signal service rendered in <lb/>the defence of that Empire <add> A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 1789</add> against a Turkish invasion, together with <lb/>the most flattering prospects of <sic>ulterior</sic> promotion)my Brother, I <lb/>say, partly for immediately assured subsistence in a married state, <lb/>animated moreover by the prospect of services to an unbounded <lb/>amount which he entertained hopes of being permitted to render <lb/> to government and the public in his own country - hopes <lb/>which have not been altogether disappointed - consented to engage <lb/>in the service of Government here, in anew office <lb/>created for that purpose, viz. that of <hi rend="underline">Inspector general of his</hi> <lb/><hi rend="underline">Majesty's Naval Works</hi>: from which period <add> (1796) </add> <sic>till</sic> a few weeks <lb/>ago, either in that office, or in the office of Commissioner of the Navy, every <lb/>moment of his time was devoted to that novel and most laborious duty: as <lb/>a list, which I have, of the services rendered by him in there his offices <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> will </p><note>+ S.B. Statement of Services, as above</note><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | |||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
ff.4. (5) +
1. Question 1. When, in relation to the Contract, the expectation
from Government failed, and the terms under the several Patents remained
as yet unexpired, how happened it that you never took the benefit
of any of these inventions, in the way originally intended?
For that you never did, is an averment included in the Statement
made by you, as it were in the terms of the Act of Parliament,
as above
Answer. Never, till the passing of the above Act,
(At 1812) viz. long after the expiration of the latest of those patents,
has there been any determinate point of time, at which my expectation
from government can be said to have altogether failed.
+ Mr Long, Treasury (speaking of a letter I have received from the + D. of Portland Secretary of State) to J. Bentham Esq. 25 March 1800
So late as in March 1800 + I was called upon, as will be seen,
by the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, after communication with
the Secretary of State to make preparation for no fewer than
2000 prisoners, being double the number stipulated for in the
Contract. Mean time, as early as in the year 1796, my above mentioned
brother (having, by his attendance in England on this
business, lost the honourable and beneficial situation he held under
the Russian Government, viz. the command of a regiment of
2000 men conferred on him for very signal service rendered in
the defence of that Empire Ao 1789 against a Turkish invasion, together with
the most flattering prospects of ulterior promotion)my Brother, I
say, partly for immediately assured subsistence in a married state,
animated moreover by the prospect of services to an unbounded
amount which he entertained hopes of being permitted to render
to government and the public in his own country - hopes
which have not been altogether disappointed - consented to engage
in the service of Government here, in anew office
created for that purpose, viz. that of Inspector general of his
Majesty's Naval Works: from which period (1796) till a few weeks
ago, either in that office, or in the office of Commissioner of the Navy, every
moment of his time was devoted to that novel and most laborious duty: as
a list, which I have, of the services rendered by him in there his offices + will
+ S.B. Statement of Services, as above
Identifier: | JB/122/494/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
122 |
Panopticon |
||
494 |
|||
001 |
|||
Copy/fair copy sheet |
2 |
||
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
F13 / F14 |
||
JOHN DICKINSON & Co 1809 |
|||
A. Levy |
|||
1809 |
|||
001 |
|||