JB/096/155/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/155/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/155/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/155/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>INTRODUCTION 3 Sanctions &#x2014; Their comparative efficacy &#x2014; Religious.</head>
 


<p>The Bishop of Gloucester, supposing him to have<lb/>
made out his proposition, that the rulers<lb/>
in every nation <add>have</add> propagated the doctrine<lb/>
of a future state of rewards &amp; punishments <note>not the existence of Punishments &amp; Rewards but their application</note><lb/>
has gone but half way towards the proving<lb/>
such a doctrine to be necessary to the [subsistence <add>being</add><lb/>
(however it may be with respect to<lb/>
<sic>it's</sic> subservience] to the well-being)<note>"Well-being" is his expression. v. 1. p. 57.</note> of Society.<lb/>
He should have <sic>shewn</sic>, at least he should be<lb/>
ready to <sic>shew</sic> in case of <sic>it's</sic> being disputed<lb/>
that in all these notions, the application <add>distribution</add> that<lb/>
was supposed to be made of those future rewards<lb/>
and punishments, was of the rewards<lb/>
to actions beneficial, &amp; of the punishments<lb/>
to actions prejudicial to it.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 21:07, 20 November 2011

Click Here To Edit

INTRODUCTION 3 Sanctions — Their comparative efficacy — Religious.

The Bishop of Gloucester, supposing him to have
made out his proposition, that the rulers
in every nation have propagated the doctrine
of a future state of rewards & punishments not the existence of Punishments & Rewards but their application
has gone but half way towards the proving
such a doctrine to be necessary to the [subsistence being
(however it may be with respect to
it's subservience] to the well-being)"Well-being" is his expression. v. 1. p. 57. of Society.
He should have shewn, at least he should be
ready to shew in case of it's being disputed
that in all these notions, the application distribution that
was supposed to be made of those future rewards
and punishments, was of the rewards
to actions beneficial, & of the punishments
to actions prejudicial to it.



Identifier: | JB/096/155/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

096

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

155

Info in main headings field

punishment introduct. sanctions - religious - disadvantages of

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31159

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in