JB/121/071/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/121/071/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


<p><del>Bill above mentioned per Sir <gap/> <gap/> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>
<p><del>Bill above mentioned per Sir <gap/> <gap/> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>
Long's official <note> 10 Mar 1800</note><lb/>Letter of the 19<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of February directing the measures for buying <lb/> <add><hi rend="underline">Expedient 2 M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Long to write for explanation <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi></add> </del> <lb/> <note>(a) See Note</note><hi rend="underline">Expedient 2 &#x2014; Long to write to the <gap/> for explanation.</hi> <lb/>
Long's official <note> 10 Mar 1800</note><lb/>Letter of the 19<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of February directing the measures for buying <lb/> <add><hi rend="underline">Expedient 2 M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Long to write for explanation <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi></add> </del> <lb/> <note>(a) See Note</note><hi rend="underline">Expedient 2 &#x2014; Long to write to the <unclear>Duke</unclear> for explanation.<hi rend="underline"> <lb/>Form accordingly.</hi><lb/><gap/></p>
 




Another expedient- more simple, more expeditious, and<lb/> less unpalatable, than retraction. (<hi rend="superscript">b </hi>)<lb/> <unclear>Mr. L. to the D. of P.<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">The Lords Commissioners of His Majesty's Treasury not<lb/> being altogether certain whether their construction of Your Graces<lb/> letter of the c - <del>august</del><del><add>Aug October</add></del> <add>August</add> be correct, they would beg to know,<lb/> whether the number of 2150 (<add>of</add></unclear>) <hi rend="underline">therein mentioned, or any and<lb/> what other number, be the number, for which, in your<lb/> Grace's opinion, provision ought to be made in the intended<lb/> Penitentiary House.(e)





Revision as of 14:44, 5 May 2015

'Click Here To Edit

Two leaves when + one for §3 F W. 13 201 Doc. 48 §8 Establishment increased a pretence for crushing Aug 17 1799 Septr 10 1800 F 13. Mr Bentham to Mr Nepean 7 chs. 2d. 10 March 1800

Bill above mentioned per Sir Mr Long's official 10 Mar 1800
Letter of the 19th of February directing the measures for buying
Expedient 2 M<hi rend="superscript">r Long to write for explanation (a)

(a) See NoteExpedient 2 — Long to write to the Duke for explanation.<hi rend="underline">
Form accordingly.


Another expedient- more simple, more expeditious, and
less unpalatable, than retraction. (b )
Mr. L. to the D. of P.
<hi rend="underline">The Lords Commissioners of His Majesty's Treasury not
being altogether certain whether their construction of Your Graces
letter of the c - augustAug October August be correct, they would beg to know,
whether the number of 2150 (of
) <hi rend="underline">therein mentioned, or any and
what other number, be the number, for which, in your
Grace's opinion, provision ought to be made in the intended
Penitentiary House.(e)



























































Identifier: | JB/121/071/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1800-03-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

071

Info in main headings field

Establishment increased a pretence for crushing it

Image

001

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D20 / F48

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

Copy of letter 1515, vol. 6

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in