JB/050/066/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/066/001: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


A 1<lb/><head>CERTAINTY <gap/> of Comm Law. Disadvantages of.</head><lb/>The very <gap/> which <add>gives foundation to</add> <del>runs through</del> & cleaves to<lb/>the very essence of the Common Laws <del>is</del> <add>subjects it <del>to</del></add> runs<lb/><add>perpetually to run</add> counter to the purposes of <gap/> Policy.<lb/><lb/>The <add>course of the</add> Common Lawyer as of the <gap/>, is to set<lb/>out with supposing his work done: the question is,<lb/><add>not what shall be, but how</add> always, what <hi rend="underline">is</hi> the common Law: now what<lb/><add>ever</add> <del>it</del> is, <add>now,</add> is what it is already; whereas what is not<lb/>as yet, but remains to be made to be, may, where<lb/>so made,<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> be accommodated to the exigencies of the<lb/>present time.<lb/><note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi><del>may</del> be governed <add>marked out</add> by<lb/>this improved reason, <gap/>.</note><lb/><lb/>
A 1<lb/><head>CERTAINTY <gap/> of Comm Law. Disadvantages of.</head><lb/>The very <gap/> which <add>gives foundation to</add> <del>runs through</del> & cleaves to<lb/>the very essence of the Common Laws <del>is</del> <add>subjects it <del>to</del></add> runs<lb/><add>perpetually to run</add> counter to the purposes of <gap/> Policy.<lb/><lb/>The <add>course of the</add> Common Lawyer as of the <gap/>, is to set<lb/>out with supposing his work done: the question is,<lb/><add>not what shall be, but how</add> always, what <hi rend="underline">is</hi> the common Law: now what<lb/><add>ever</add> <del>it</del> is, <add>now,</add> is what it is already; whereas what is not<lb/>as yet, but remains to be made to be, may, where<lb/>so made,<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> be accommodated to the exigencies of the<lb/>present time.<lb/><note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi><del>may</del> be governed <add>marked out</add> by<lb/>this improved reasoning.</note><lb/><lb/>Hence it is that in common Law, a reason<lb/>may be competent that is no ways founded upon <add>and end with</add><lb/>[any particular expediency: & <add>in effect</add> therefore, <del>Reason</del> <add>the word</add><lb/>Reason as applied to Common & to Statute Law<lb/>has two different significations: in the latter, it<lb/>denotes the <add>special</add> expediency of that particular provision to which<lb/>it is applied: in the latter, only that general expediency which<lb/>results from its <gap/> and the general plan of uniformity<lb/>of <gap/>, and of restraint upon the Judges in the latter it means<lb/>a <hi rend="underline">Justification</hi>, in the former <hi rend="underline">only a cause:</hi> in the latter, it<lb/>accounts for <hi rend="underline">"why it ought to be;"</hi> in the latter, simply for <hi rend="underline">"why it is."</hi>





Revision as of 20:56, 20 September 2013

Click Here To Edit

A 1
CERTAINTY of Comm Law. Disadvantages of.
The very which gives foundation to runs through & cleaves to
the very essence of the Common Laws is subjects it to runs
perpetually to run counter to the purposes of Policy.

The course of the Common Lawyer as of the , is to set
out with supposing his work done: the question is,
not what shall be, but how always, what is the common Law: now what
ever it is, now, is what it is already; whereas what is not
as yet, but remains to be made to be, may, where
so made,+ be accommodated to the exigencies of the
present time.
+may be governed marked out by
this improved reasoning.


Hence it is that in common Law, a reason
may be competent that is no ways founded upon and end with
[any particular expediency: & in effect therefore, Reason the word
Reason as applied to Common & to Statute Law
has two different significations: in the latter, it
denotes the special expediency of that particular provision to which
it is applied: in the latter, only that general expediency which
results from its and the general plan of uniformity
of , and of restraint upon the Judges in the latter it means
a Justification, in the former only a cause: in the latter, it
accounts for "why it ought to be;" in the latter, simply for "why it is."




Identifier: | JB/050/066/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

066

Info in main headings field

certainty form of comm. law disadvantages of

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

gr

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16057

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in