JB/150/637/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/637/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<del>Judging from the <gap/></del><lb/>U<p>pon the fact of these precedents, the question<lb/>as between franking and payment does not <del>turn<lb/>out to be of t</del> promise to be of that importance<lb/>that was at first expected, because the greatest<lb/>probably amount of the payments likely to be made<lb/>int his score, does not, as far as these precedents<lb/>afford an adequate standard, turn out to<lb/>be so great as was expected.  But the <gap/> seems to be, <del>as</del><lb/>that no <add>decided</add> inference can <add>well</add> be drawn from the one<lb/>to the other as to this point.  In the case of<lb/>the Board of Police no <add>precise</add> limits can be set to the<lb/><add>probable</add> copiousness of the correspondence: this much however<lb/>may be asserted without difficulty, that the<lb/>more copious <del>a power,</del> the more serviceable, <del>it<lb/>untill the serviceableness shall have begun to reduce the<lb/>will be, until the time shall have arrived<lb/>copiousness.<lb/>when the service it has rendered shall have</del><lb/>untill the service done by it, shall have begun  to<lb/><del>operated in diminution of the copiousness of the</del><lb/>lessen the demand for it. <lb/><del>demand for it.</del><lb/></p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





Revision as of 01:58, 29 April 2015

Click Here To Edit

Judging from the
U

pon the fact of these precedents, the question
as between franking and payment does not turn
out to be of t
promise to be of that importance
that was at first expected, because the greatest
probably amount of the payments likely to be made
int his score, does not, as far as these precedents
afford an adequate standard, turn out to
be so great as was expected. But the seems to be, as
that no decided inference can well be drawn from the one
to the other as to this point. In the case of
the Board of Police no precise limits can be set to the
probable copiousness of the correspondence: this much however
may be asserted without difficulty, that the
more copious a power, the more serviceable, it
untill the serviceableness shall have begun to reduce the
will be, until the time shall have arrived
copiousness.
when the service it has rendered shall have

untill the service done by it, shall have begun to
operated in diminution of the copiousness of the
lessen the demand for it.
demand for it.















Identifier: | JB/150/637/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

637

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d8 / f208

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

g & ep 1794

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

fr3

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1794

Notes public

ID Number

50858

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in