★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- pencil annotations --> <p> 1 Inserenda 5<lb/> Observations</p> <note>I. Board<lb/> <gap/><lb/> 42<lb/> Country <gap/><lb/> appointed as <gap/><lb/> Correspondents and <lb/> for appointing <add. County</add> Police<lb/>Surveyors. Why</note> <p> [<gap/> ] [<gap/>] page 25.§.9. [<hi rend="underline">Country Commissioners of Police or Country Police</hi> <hi rend="underline">Magistrate</hi>]</p> <p> The use of the proposed appointment of a <lb/>Commissioner of Police or Police Magistrate for<lb/>each licencing Division is to provide for the discharge<lb/> of the two following functions: 1. The <lb/> nomination of the Officers thereinafter mentioned <lb/> <del> for the Meeting</del> who <del>it</del>are to collect the licence<del>d</del><lb/> duties and inspect the conduct of the <hi rend="underline">Licentiates</hi> <lb/> <Add> (if so they may be termed) </add> in the <del><gap/></del> Country Districts: 2. the keeping up<lb/> a more <del>closer</del> regular correspondence with <lb/> the Board than a Country Magistrate, taken<lb/> at random, would <add> be</add> always disposed to <del>take the</del> <add> <sic>burthen</sic> himself</add> <lb/> <del><sic>burthen</sic> of.</del> As the patronage <add>thus exercised</add> would be considerable,<lb/>the supposition is that there are few Licencing Divisions<lb/> if any, <del>that will not</del> <add> but what will </add> afford <del>: at least</del> some one fit<lb/> person at least, who in consideration of the patronage, <lb/> <del> together with</del> <add> with or without</add> the masks of honour, if any, which <lb/> it may be thought fit to annex to it, will be willing <lb/> to undertake the trouble.</p> <p> Two questions here present themselves — 1.<lb/> <del>for by give the patronage <Add>of each district</add> to a country gentleman<lb/> in the way <add> each District</add> either</del> why <del>divide</del> <add> give</add> the patronage to <lb/> <del>among</del> the Country Gentleman in this way, rather<lb/> than give it <add> to</add> or rather suffer it to rest, in the <lb/> usual way, with <del>the Board</del> Administration? 2. <del> Why to a simple<lb/> Among the Magistrates of each Division, why give <lb/> it to a each <del>person</del> <add> individual</add> rather than to the body at <lb/> large? <add> To the <del><gap/.</del> two questions taken together, the </add> <del> As to the <gap/. the <gap/> </del> answer<lb/> may be as follows. <del> If given to the </del> Board<lb/> <del>is on the Board of Police upon the evidence <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> <add> <gap/> </add> </del> </p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
1 Inserenda 5
Observations
I. Board
42
Country
appointed as
Correspondents and
for appointing <add. County</add> Police
Surveyors. Why
[ ] [] page 25.§.9. [Country Commissioners of Police or Country Police Magistrate]
The use of the proposed appointment of a
Commissioner of Police or Police Magistrate for
each licencing Division is to provide for the discharge
of the two following functions: 1. The
nomination of the Officers thereinafter mentioned
for the Meeting who itare to collect the licenced
duties and inspect the conduct of the Licentiates
(if so they may be termed) in the Country Districts: 2. the keeping up
a more closer regular correspondence with
the Board than a Country Magistrate, taken
at random, would be always disposed to take the burthen himself
burthen of. As the patronage thus exercised would be considerable,
the supposition is that there are few Licencing Divisions
if any, that will not but what will afford : at least some one fit
person at least, who in consideration of the patronage,
together with with or without the masks of honour, if any, which
it may be thought fit to annex to it, will be willing
to undertake the trouble.
Two questions here present themselves — 1.
for by give the patronage of each district to a country gentleman
in the way each District either why divide give the patronage to
among the Country Gentleman in this way, rather
than give it to or rather suffer it to rest, in the
usual way, with the Board Administration? 2. Why to a simple
Among the Magistrates of each Division, why give
it to a each person individual rather than to the body at
large? To the <gap/. two questions taken together, the As to the <gap/. the answer
may be as follows. If given to the Board
is on the Board of Police upon the evidence
|
Identifier: | JB/150/711/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
42 |
|||
|
150 |
police bill |
||
|
711 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d1 / f51 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
g & ep 1794 |
||
|
fr3 |
|||
|
1794 |
|||
|
50932 |
|||
