JB/150/725/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/725/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- This whole page is lightly crossed through --> <note>Temporary Panopt<lb/> contract</note> <p> <del> And whereas the said Lords Commissioners<lb/>have accordingly fixed upon a spot of ground</del> </p><note>Delay in <gap/> <lb/> Law Office</note> <p>Were any paper on the subject to have the <lb/>pass through the Law Offices, <del> the <gap/> </del> that <lb/><del> would be given to</del> the Temporary Panopticon<lb/>would <del>be </del> not be to begin <gap/> <gap/> long after<lb/>the time when the Permanent Panopticon brought<lb/>if public men did their duty <add> public duties were properly discharged.</add> be completed.<lb/><gap/> <gap/> this one <gap/>.  The <sic>Draught</sic><lb/>of the Contract went to the Soll.<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Gen.<hi rend="superscript">l</hi> on the <lb/> <gap/> of <gap/. 1798 it <del> was ret</del> received his <gap/> <add> <gap/. </add> <lb/> <del>in</del> the 30 of Oct.<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> in that same Year<lb/><del>He</del> It required a number of alterations to <lb/> <gap/> to his minds he <gap/> them every<lb/> one.  It received the <gap/> <add> <gap/> </add> of the Att<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> Gen.<hi rend="superscript">l</hi><lb/>in the 31 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1798.  these two months <del>it lay</del> <lb/> <del> before him</del> produced a <del>d</del> supposed demand for <lb/> alteration.  In states the supposed demand for <lb/> alteration, but makes none in consequence <add> the alteration remains unmade</add> <lb/> <note>An <gap/> amnesty being <add> to be</add> granted to a man for the benefit of that same man, it <gap/> the completion of the Att. Gen.<hi rend="superscript">l</hi> to <gap/ <gap/> <add> which was the</add> <sic>jugements</sic> should be <add>were to</add> be made <add> to</add></note><lb/> <del> <gap/> <gap/. </del> The <gap/> was already evident <lb/>to every conception but that of him <add> the Attorney general</add> who made it.<lb/>It was evident t6o the <sic>Sollicitor</sic> General.  To determine <note>With uncommon <gap/> </note><lb/> how this doubt was to be <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> an <gap/> <gap/> clue  <gap/> at Mr White's<lb/>It was at last settled to the satisfaction of Mr White<add> The words <del>were at length <gap/> of</del> of the amendment were at</add> <lb/> two years have elapsed, and to this hour the amendment<lb/> remains unmade.<p>
 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:08, 5 February 2015

Click Here To Edit

Temporary Panopt
contract

And whereas the said Lords Commissioners
have accordingly fixed upon a spot of ground

Delay in
Law Office

Were any paper on the subject to have the
pass through the Law Offices, the that
would be given to the Temporary Panopticon
would be not be to begin long after
the time when the Permanent Panopticon brought
if public men did their duty public duties were properly discharged. be completed.
this one . The Draught
of the Contract went to the Soll.r Gen.l on the
of <gap/. 1798 it was ret received his <gap/.
in the 30 of Oct.r in that same Year
He It required a number of alterations to
to his minds he them every
one. It received the of the Atty Gen.l
in the 31 Decr 1798. these two months it lay
before him produced a d supposed demand for
alteration. In states the supposed demand for
alteration, but makes none in consequence the alteration remains unmade
An amnesty being to be granted to a man for the benefit of that same man, it the completion of the Att. Gen.l to <gap/ which was the jugements should be were to be made to
<gap/. The was already evident
to every conception but that of him the Attorney general who made it.
It was evident t6o the Sollicitor General. To determine With uncommon
how this doubt was to be
an clue at Mr White's
It was at last settled to the satisfaction of Mr White The words were at length of of the amendment were at
two years have elapsed, and to this hour the amendment
remains unmade.



Identifier: | JB/150/725/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

16

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

725

Info in main headings field

inserenda police revenue bill

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

b3 / f11

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50946

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in