★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p> <add> 28 July 1808 </add> <add> Charge 9 </add> <add>12</add> <lb/><note>Charge <lb/>5 Information withholden <lb/>15 or 3 <lb/>2. - but indirect | <p> <add> 28 July 1808 </add> <add> Charge 9 </add> <add>12</add> <lb/><note>Charge <lb/>5 Information withholden <lb/>15 or 3 <lb/>2. - but indirect <lb/> notice of an alarming<lb/> tendency - <gap/> <lb/>rejection: viz. <lb/> With this evidence before <lb/> him his call for <lb/> "other evidence"</note></p> <p> <add> 12 </add> <lb/><del> In some indirect way, and in effect <gap/> <gap/> </del> <lb/><add>Of the tender <gap/> <gap/> <add> by <gap/> <gap/> </add> together with the prayer annexed to it <add> Mr Chief Inspector</add> in </add><lb/><add>an indirect way, <del><gap/></del>, in this instance as in every</add> <lb/><add> other, <del> Mr Chief Inspector</del> does indeed take notice. By implication and <lb/><add> inference, he </add> given the <gap/> <add> formed for appraising and </add> <del> to understand </del> that <add>evidencing </add> the testimony <lb/>they tendered, would not, any part of it, be received.<lb/> <del> either</del> would not be received in either of the <gap/> <lb/> <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> proposed <del> as above </del> by way of example <add> as above </add> or in <lb/>any other — <add> shape</add> <del> <gap/> </del> </p><p><sic>T'is</sic> with the <gap/> of this testimony viz the <lb/> testimony of these <gap/> persons before his eyes, he <lb/> calls for <hi rend="underline">other</hi> evidence: <add> other evidence </add> from a different <hi rend="underline">source</hi> and <lb/>in a different <hi rend="underline">form</hi>: viz <hi rend="underline">the receipts of the</hi> <lb/> "<hi rend="underline">parties</hi>" (meaning the <add> several</add> workmen to whom the several <lb/>weekly payments <del> recorded</del> <add> entered </add> in the said Account Books<lb/> <note><add>[+]</add> True it is, that <gap/> <del>be endured </del> <gap/> goes on, and in general terms given to the Accountant the option between that <gap/> (to use his own words) <gap/> "<hi rend="underline">other</hi> evidence"</note> <lb/>were made) <del> <gap/> there ended his <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <add> <del> In addition </del></add> <add> <del> In the other evidence <gap/> specially <gap/> </del> </add> <lb/> <del> in the way of <add> he <gap/> <gap/> and <gap/> </add> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> evidence. </del> <add> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> </add></p> <p> But by the words <del> such </del> "other evidence" <add> is <del> then </del> <add> <gap/> </add> employed by him) he could <lb/>scarcely have meant, or wished to be understood to mean, <lb/>the evidence so tendered as above, or any part of <lb/>it: This <add> <hi rend="superscript">[+2]</hi> evidence </add> <del> meaning must have been </del> <add> which <del> <gap/> <del> <add> it </add> can not but </add> have been his <lb/> <note> <del> [+]</del> <add> [+2] For, had that been his </add> <del> with every <gap/> </del> <gap/>, he would <del> have </del> of course, have designated by its appropriate <gap/> the evidence <del> that <gap/> <add> <gap/> </add> abovementioned</del> which, on this supposition, he meant should be producing viz the evidence that had already been tendered</note> </lb/><add> wish to be understood to call for, is therefore - <del> <gap/> wish <gap/> <gap/> </del> some evidence <hi rend="underline">other</hi> than <lb/>any that had <add> as yet</add> been tendered: in a word, the object <lb/>of this part of the communication was - to give <lb/>to the Accountant to understand <add> though without <add> the Inspector </add> so far committing himself as to <gap/> so <gap/>)<lb/>as the <add> Accountant </add> had to produce, be it what it might, would <lb/>not be received as satisfactory and sufficient; <lb/>but that whatever it might be <add> there were produced, some other) </add> <del> some </del> evidence viz <lb/><gap/> <add> some other evidence</add> which he <hi rend="underline">had</hi> not to produce: and <gap/> <hi rend="underline">toties</hi> | ||
<hi rend="underline">quoties</hi> </p> | <hi rend="underline">quoties</hi> </p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
28 July 1808 Charge 9 12
Charge
5 Information withholden
15 or 3
2. - but indirect
notice of an alarming
tendency -
rejection: viz.
With this evidence before
him his call for
"other evidence"
12
In some indirect way, and in effect
Of the tender <add> by together with the prayer annexed to it Mr Chief Inspector in </add>
an indirect way, , in this instance as in every
other, Mr Chief Inspector does indeed take notice. By implication and
<add> inference, he given the formed for appraising and to understand that evidencing the testimony
they tendered, would not, any part of it, be received.
either would not be received in either of the
proposed as above by way of example as above or in
any other — shape
T'is with the of this testimony viz the
testimony of these persons before his eyes, he
calls for other evidence: other evidence from a different source and
in a different form: viz the receipts of the
"parties" (meaning the several workmen to whom the several
weekly payments recorded entered in the said Account Books
[+] True it is, that be endured goes on, and in general terms given to the Accountant the option between that (to use his own words) "other evidence"
were made) there ended his <add> In addition </add> In the other evidence specially
in the way of he and evidence.
But by the words such "other evidence" is then <add> employed by him) he could
scarcely have meant, or wished to be understood to mean,
the evidence so tendered as above, or any part of
it: This [+2] evidence meaning must have been which can not but </add> have been his <add> it
[+] [+2] For, had that been his with every , he would have of course, have designated by its appropriate the evidence that abovementioned which, on this supposition, he meant should be producing viz the evidence that had already been tendered </lb/> wish to be understood to call for, is therefore - wish some evidence other than
any that had <add> as yet been tendered: in a word, the object
of this part of the communication was - to give
to the Accountant to understand though without <add> the Inspector so far committing himself as to so )
as the Accountant had to produce, be it what it might, would
not be received as satisfactory and sufficient;
but that whatever it might be there were produced, some other) some evidence viz
some other evidence which he had not to produce: and toties
quoties
Identifier: | JB/122/150/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1808-07-21 |
15 or 3 |
||
122 |
Panopticon |
||
150 |
Charge 9 |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D12 / E12 |
||
TH 1806 |
|||
Andre Morellet |
|||
1806 |
|||
See note 3 to letter 1986, vol. 7 |
001 |
||