JB/096/016/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/096/016/004: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


 
<!-- I've a feeling that the text may in fact start at the words 'forbidden by the divine law, he is worthy, line 5, but as he's put a line around the whole paragraph and sectioned off the top portion, I'm unsure. He does however, repeat the start of that sentence in the lower portion. The smaller writing at the top and to the right, could need to be added in somewhere, but I'm unsure where. Bit of a mess this one to try and figure out his intention, but as I've typed it as it is, it does actually read quite well, so please check my interpretation of his layout of content.  Bentham has also spelt Jealousy correctly in one place and incorrectly in another (lines 2 and 4 of his folio.  I've typed them as written, so amend if you need to. -->
under construction ...
 


<note><hi rend='underline'>to be copied</hi></note>
<note><hi rend='underline'>to be copied</hi></note>
<head>Note</head>
<p>"Well in the <gap/> &amp; with thy Children." &#x2014; If any part of the mosaic law should
<p>"Well in the <gap/> &amp; with thy Children." &#x2014; If any part of the mosaic law should
<lb/>
<lb/>
find us, this is the part: the Legislator is so earnest in enforcing it: &amp; <gap/>
find us, this is the part: the Legislator is so earnest in enforcing it: &amp; <gap/>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>a</del> reason which if it had any weight at <gap/> four thousand ago has <unclear>pre</unclear>
<del>a</del> reason which if it had any weight at <unclear>Judea</unclear> four thousand ago has precisely
<lb/>
<lb/>
the same weight now &amp; in England.  For the blood of the animal is as much the  
the same weight now &amp; in England.  For the blood of the animal is as much the  
Line 17: Line 16:
<del>forbidden by the divine law, he is worthy</del> life of the animal now
<del>forbidden by the divine law, he is worthy</del> life of the animal now
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>though man is degenerated by the fall, the Animals are the same</del> as then, here as these.
<del>though man is degenerated by the fall, the Animals are the same</del> as then, here as there.
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>as</del> <del><gap/></del> <del>the beginning</del> &amp; yet I dare say, our learned judge has no samples when  
<del>as</del> <del><gap/></del> <del>the beginning</del> &amp; yet I dare say, our learned judge has no samples when  
he is eating
he is eating
<lb/>
<lb/>
a good <del>of death?  As would <add><del>he?<</del>/add> our author introduce</del>, <del><gap/> Chapter <gap/> Ver: <unclear>11</unclear> <gap/></del>
a good <del>of death?  As would <add>he?</add> our author introduce,</del> <del><gap/> Chapter <gap/> Ver:<unclear>11</unclear> <gap/></del>
<lb/>
<lb/>
sirloin: or a <del>good well</del> a savory launch. <del>(end of note)</del> even though the prohibition
sirloin: or <del>a good well</del> a savory haunch. <del>(end of note)</del> even though the prohibition
<lb/>
<lb/>
is repeated in the only apostolical council we read of.</p>
is repeated in the only apostolical council we read of.</p>
Line 30: Line 29:
<p>Forbidden by the divine Law he ought, to be hanged.  Would
<p>Forbidden by the divine Law he ought, to be hanged.  Would
<lb/>
<lb/>
our Author introduce in to <add>in to the english Laws the trial of added text</add>the English code the trial of jealousy? &#x2014; (<gap/> Ch. V. V II &amp; <gap/> <add>jealosy? or</add> <del>or</del> the law of fringes? or would he command Numb: chap. 15. Ver 37
our Author introduce <add><del>into the english laws the Trial of jealousy?</del></add> into the English code the trial of &#x2014; <note>(<gap/> Ch. V. V II &amp; <gap/></note>
<lb/>
<add>jealosy? or</add> <del>or</del> the law of fringes? or would he command Numb: chap. 15. Ver 37
<lb/>
<lb/>
a man to be stoned, who should gather
a man to be stoned, who should gather
<lb/>
<lb/>
Sticks on the Sabbath day? <note>Numb: 15 Ver. 32.</note> <del>would he substitute</del> <add>the command for doing no manner of work in which day, is read every day in our <gap/> as being still in force.  Would he substitute</add>  
Sticks on the Sabbath day? <note>Numb: 15 Ver. 32.</note> <del>would he substitute</del> <add>the command for doing no manner of work in which day, is read every day in our chamber as being still in force.  Would he substitute</add>  
<lb/>
<lb/>
the laws of inheritance prescribed
the laws of inheritance prescribed

Revision as of 11:43, 29 October 2010

Click Here To Edit


to be copied Note

"Well in the & with thy Children." — If any part of the mosaic law should
find us, this is the part: the Legislator is so earnest in enforcing it: &
a reason which if it had any weight at Judea four thousand ago has precisely
the same weight now & in England. For the blood of the animal is as much the
forbidden by the divine law, he is worthy life of the animal now
though man is degenerated by the fall, the Animals are the same as then, here as there.
as the beginning & yet I dare say, our learned judge has no samples when he is eating
a good of death? As would he? our author introduce, Chapter Ver:11
sirloin: or a good well a savory haunch. (end of note) even though the prohibition
is repeated in the only apostolical council we read of.


---page break---

Forbidden by the divine Law he ought, to be hanged. Would
our Author introduce into the english laws the Trial of jealousy? into the English code the trial of — ( Ch. V. V II &
jealosy? or or the law of fringes? or would he command Numb: chap. 15. Ver 37
a man to be stoned, who should gather
Sticks on the Sabbath day? Numb: 15 Ver. 32. would he substitute the command for doing no manner of work in which day, is read every day in our chamber as being still in force. Would he substitute
the laws of inheritance prescribed
by Moses, in the room of the laws of inheritance,
prescribed by the common law of
England? Deut: Chap. 21. Ver: 18 would he stone the "stubborn,
"and rebellious Son, who will not obey the
"Voice of his father, or the voice of his mother
"and when they are chastening him, will
"not hearken unto them." Would he make it

44




Identifier: | JB/096/016/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

016

Info in main headings field

Image

004

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c41 / c42 / c43 / c44

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

31020

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in