JB/169/156/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/169/156/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
of The <del>two</del> pretty ladies <add>two</add> were for J.'s nieces, the two Miss ramers<lb/>
<del>seem and</del><add>nor did </add> the epithet  seem<del>ed not altogether</del> inapplicable.





Revision as of 08:17, 2 October 2017

Click Here To Edit

of The two pretty ladies two were for J.'s nieces, the two Miss ramers
seem andnor did the epithet seemed not altogether inapplicable.




Identifier: | JB/169/156/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 169.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

169

Main Headings

Folio number

156

Info in main headings field

no 3

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[fleur-de-lys motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

letter 683, vol. 4

ID Number

56976

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in