JB/107/240/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/107/240/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


"It is necessary (another <unclear>said</unclear>) to the good order of society<lb/>
<p>"It is necessary (another <unclear>said</unclear>) to the good order of society<lb/>
"and to the reputation and authority of government, that<lb/>
"and to the reputation and authority of government, that<lb/>
"this be <hi rend="underline">known</hi> (here we approach  to a specific meaning)<lb/>
"this be <hi rend="underline">known</hi> (here we approach  to a specific meaning)<lb/>
Line 15: Line 15:
The Reverend Doctor does<add>did</add> he know exactly what his own<lb/>
The Reverend Doctor does<add>did</add> he know exactly what his own<lb/>
meaning was when he spoke <add>was speaking</add> of such unmerited
meaning was when he spoke <add>was speaking</add> of such unmerited
partiality?<lb/>
partiality?<lb/>  
<del>Did <gap/></del> <add>In an</add> <hi rend="underline">An indiction</hi>! <del>for</del><add><del>charging</del> a charge made of</add> <hi rend="underline">the admission of extrinsic</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">or oblique considerations</hi> in any such situation,<lb/>
would be here expected to find it
<unclear>build</unclear> good in <unclear>admission</unclear><lb/>
or <add>in an <hi rend="underline">informative</hi></add> <gap/> as sufficient to ground a rule to show cause?</p>
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 11:24, 6 December 2013

Click Here To Edit

"It is necessary (another said) to the good order of society
"and to the reputation and authority of government, that
"this be known (here we approach to a specific meaning)
"known (continues he) and believed to be the case in each part of the endings.
Which reflections show, that the admission of
"extrinsic or oblique considerations, in dispensing the power
of pardon, is a crime in the authors and advisers
of such unmerited partiality, of the same nature with
"that of corruption in a judge." — "A crime", indeed?
The Reverend Doctor doesdid he know exactly what his own
meaning was when he spoke was speaking of such unmerited partiality?
Did In an An indiction! forcharging a charge made of the admission of extrinsic
or oblique considerations in any such situation,
would be here expected to find it build good in admission
or in an informative as sufficient to ground a rule to show cause?



Identifier: | JB/107/240/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107.

Date_1

1809-01-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

9

Box

107

Main Headings

law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net)

Folio number

240

Info in main headings field

peines

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e39

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

pr1

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

35231

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in