★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<p><note><hi rend='underline'>To be copied</hi></note> <foreign>"homines constituit, vocatur jus gentium:"</foreign | <p><note><hi rend='underline'>To be copied</hi></note> <foreign>"homines constituit, vocatur jus gentium:"</foreign> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
he sends us to a non entity: he refers us to a | he sends us to a non entity: he refers us to a | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
rule which never did, and, I fear, never will | rule which never did, and, I fear, never will | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
exist.</p> | exist.<lb/></p> | ||
<p>The fact is, the <add>terms</add> law of nations, however allowable | <p>The fact is, the <add>terms</add> law of nations, however allowable | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
conveyed by the french <del>tongue</del> <add>term</add> of <foreign>droit des | conveyed by the french <del>tongue</del> <add>term</add> of <foreign>droit des | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
gens.</foreign | gens.</foreign> and the French writers <del>sho</del> have not availed themselves | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
of the possession of the term as they might have done | of the possession of the term as they might have done | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del><foreign>gens</foreign>.</del>] <del>au.</del><!-- horizontal line from last word and under last line of text, then ... --> end of note</p> | <del><foreign>gens</foreign>.</del>] <del>au.</del><!-- horizontal line from last word and under last line of text, then ... --> end of note<lb/></p> | ||
<!-- another horizontal line --> | <!-- another horizontal line --> | ||
<p>'Tis strange how this confusion of terms | <p>'Tis strange how this confusion of terms | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
disfigures <del>& pe</del> <add>even</add> arguments whirls <del><unclear>Ilad</unclear></del> <unclear>woned</unclear></p> | disfigures <del>& pe</del> <add>even</add> arguments whirls <del><unclear>Ilad</unclear></del> <unclear>woned</unclear><lb/></p> | ||
<head>62</head> | <head>62</head> | ||
To be copied "homines constituit, vocatur jus gentium:"
he sends us to a non entity: he refers us to a
rule which never did, and, I fear, never will
exist.
The fact is, the terms law of nations, however allowable
the Phrase may be in common conversation,
should never find a place in a philosophical
discussion of law: and that for this
plain reason, that nations have no common
superior upon earth, from whom —
they can receive a Law. [Note to the end of The English language
wants a term to express the idea,
conveyed by the french tongue term of droit des
gens. and the French writers sho have not availed themselves
of the possession of the term as they might have done
gens.] au. end of note
'Tis strange how this confusion of terms
disfigures & pe even arguments whirls Ilad woned
62
|
Identifier: | JB/096/022/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
|
022 |
|||
|
002 |
|||
|
collectanea |
4 |
||
|
recto |
c61 / c62 / c63 / c64 |
||
|
168 |
[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]] |
||
|
[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]] |
31026 |
||
