★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
<p>1. Expence of conveyance <lb/>being paid for <lb/>once for all is small <lb/>in comparison of the <lb/>difference between <lb/>maintenance and construction <lb/>together <lb/>upon a large and <gap/> <lb/>upon a small scale <lb/>as above. (In 44, 49 <add>46.</add>) p.3.</p> | <p>1. Expence of conveyance <lb/>being paid for <lb/>once for all is small <lb/>in comparison of the <lb/>difference between <lb/>maintenance and construction <lb/>together <lb/>upon a large and <gap/> <lb/>upon a small scale <lb/>as above. (In 44, 49 <add>46.</add>) p.3.</p> | ||
<head>61 or 9 V. 8 </head> | |||
<p>On the contract plan <lb/>the extra charge of <lb/>conveyance produced <lb/>by remoteness from the <lb/>prison might be done <lb/>away: Contractor <lb/>being paid according <lb/>to the average distance. <add>p. 4</add></p> | |||
<head>§.14 62 or 10 V. 1</head> | |||
<p>Endless to wait for <lb/> agreement amongst <lb/>all the Counties as <lb/>to the provision in <lb/>respect of the building & <lb/>in Penitentiary receptacles.</p> | |||
<p>No such agreement <lb/>has been waited for as <lb/>to the Colonization <lb/>& Hulk provision. <add>p.4.</add></p> | |||
Apr. 1811 1 4 Panopt. J.B. to Penitentiary Committee Letter IIV Part 2. §. II (or 7) I.1
54, or 1
J.B.'s Penopticon supposed
confirmed, question
what to be done
about the counties? p. 1.
I 2 55 or 2
Per J.B. London
Panopticon as large as
convenient, others also
at a maximum should
be set down in the
counties: — size
maximum thence
number minimum. p.1.
I 3 56 or 3
First and natural idea,
one per County, perhaps
objection such a county
would send but 5 or 6. p. 2
I 4 57 or 4
Thereupon notion of so
ordering matters, that
Counties may be engaged
voluntarily to unite. p.2.
V 6 §12 58 or 5.
Reasons against sending
County Convicts to London.
1. Expence of conveyance.
2. Danger of forcible escapes
3. Accumulation after
accumulated, when
employment is not: than
discharge where not .p.2
1.5 or 6.
Hereupon per J.B.
option between
1. Open mode on a
Large scale.
2. Close mode on a
small scale.
Close mode that pursued
in all the existing
prisons.
Open that here advocated
by J.B. p.3.
---page break---
59 or 7.
J.B.'s defence of the open
mode good as to other
matters, it will not
be rendered inapplicable
by the above two
objections. p.3.
§13 60 or 8 V. 7
1. Expence of conveyance
being paid for
once for all is small
in comparison of the
difference between
maintenance and construction
together
upon a large and
upon a small scale
as above. (In 44, 49 46.) p.3.
61 or 9 V. 8
On the contract plan
the extra charge of
conveyance produced
by remoteness from the
prison might be done
away: Contractor
being paid according
to the average distance. p. 4
§.14 62 or 10 V. 1
Endless to wait for
agreement amongst
all the Counties as
to the provision in
respect of the building &
in Penitentiary receptacles.
No such agreement
has been waited for as
to the Colonization
& Hulk provision. p.4.
|
Identifier: | JB/117/401/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1811-04 |
54 or 1 - 58 or 5, or 6, 59 or 7 - 68 or 16 |
||
|
117 |
panopticon |
||
|
401 |
panopt. jb to penitentiary committee letter iii |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d1 / e4 |
||
|
john herbert koe |
|||
|
39018 |
|||
