JB/117/021/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/117/021/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
<head>Bicetre Proposal Objections</head>
<head>Bicetre Proposal Objections</head>


<p><hi rend="underline">Pecuniary profit possible and therefore <lb/>personal <add>private</add> interest the motive</hi> &#x2014; This is the <lb/><del>mos</del> characteristic <add>peculiar</add> excellence of the system: &#x2014; that <lb/>while he is pursuing his own interest, as every <lb/>man must be supposed and expected to do, he <lb/>is whether he will or no pursuing the interest of the <lb/>establishment. I have said, and I hope I have <lb/>proved, that a person who <add>in such an instance <add>a station</add> </add> has not the tie of <lb/>personal interest to bind him to his duty will <lb/><note>will never perform <lb/>it to the best advantage</note> <lb/><add>not long conti</add> not long be fit for it. The true question is, is <add>does</add> <lb/>any thing <add>personal interest</add> in this case leave any thing to apprehend <lb/>from it? on the contrary, directed as it is, <lb/>does not every thing depend upon it? <add>its influence?</add> is not every <lb/>thing to be hoped for from the presence <add>its action</add>, every thing <lb/>to be feared from the want of it? In general <lb/>a danger attends the employing a man whose <lb/>motives <del>are</del> for undertaking the employment are <lb/>of the interested kind (though what other sort <lb/>of man can you make sure of? <del>the</del> a danger <lb/>I say &#x2014; why? because interest may seduce <lb/>him to violate <add>from the <del>g</del> line of</add> his duty: &#x2014; but if matters are <lb/>so ordered that he can not promote <add>pursue</add> his <add>that</add> interest but in <lb/>  <add>proportion</add>
<p><hi rend="underline">Pecuniary profit possible and therefore <lb/>personal <add>private</add> interest the motive</hi> &#x2014; This is the <lb/><del>mos</del> characteristic <add>peculiar</add> excellence of the system: &#x2014; that <lb/>while he is pursuing his own interest, as every <lb/>man must be supposed and expected to do, he <lb/>is whether he will or no pursuing the interest of the <lb/>establishment. I have said, and I hope I have <lb/>proved, that a person who <add>in such an instance <add>a station</add> </add> has not the tie of <lb/>personal interest to bind him to his duty will <lb/><note>will never perform <lb/>it to the best advantage</note> <lb/><add>not long conti</add> not long be fit for it. The true question is, is <add>does</add> <lb/>any thing <add>personal interest</add> in this case leave any thing to apprehend <lb/>from it? on the contrary, directed as it is, <lb/>does not every thing depend upon it? <add>its influence?</add> is not every <lb/>thing to be hoped for from the presence <add>its action</add>, every thing <lb/>to be feared from the want of it? In general <lb/>a danger attends the employing a man whose <lb/>motives <del>are</del> for undertaking the employment are <lb/>of the interested kind (though what other sort <lb/>of man can you make sure of?) <del>the</del> a danger <lb/>I say &#x2014; why? because interest may seduce <lb/>him to violate <add>from the <del>g</del> line of</add> his duty: &#x2014; but if matters are <lb/>so ordered that he can not promote <add>pursue</add> his <add>that</add> interest but in <lb/>  <add>proportion</add>
</p>
</p>



Revision as of 23:15, 27 January 2014

Click Here To Edit

9 Bicetre Proposal Objections

Pecuniary profit possible and therefore
personal private interest the motive
— This is the
mos characteristic peculiar excellence of the system: — that
while he is pursuing his own interest, as every
man must be supposed and expected to do, he
is whether he will or no pursuing the interest of the
establishment. I have said, and I hope I have
proved, that a person who in such an instance <add>a station </add> has not the tie of
personal interest to bind him to his duty will
will never perform
it to the best advantage

not long conti not long be fit for it. The true question is, is does
any thing personal interest in this case leave any thing to apprehend
from it? on the contrary, directed as it is,
does not every thing depend upon it? its influence? is not every
thing to be hoped for from the presence its action, every thing
to be feared from the want of it? In general
a danger attends the employing a man whose
motives are for undertaking the employment are
of the interested kind (though what other sort
of man can you make sure of?) the a danger
I say — why? because interest may seduce
him to violate from the g line of his duty: — but if matters are
so ordered that he can not promote pursue his that interest but in
proportion



Identifier: | JB/117/021/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

117

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

021

Info in main headings field

bicetre proposal

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f9 / f10 / f11 / f12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

38638

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in