★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>—stance of this very spot, when first fixed upon for a <lb/> Penitentiary House. Two places were fixed upon for<lb/> as many Penitentiary Houses: One in Wandsworth<lb/> Common Field for females: this at Battersea Rise<lb/> for males. People in Wandsworth were alarmed: people<lb/> in Battersea were alarmed: the judges disallowed<lb/> the choice of Wandsworth Field, not because <lb/> they considered the alarms of neighbourhoods as sufficient<lb/> grounds for negativing such a choice, (for if<lb/> they had they must have rejected this spot as well as the other) but because they regarded this <hi rend="underline">one</hi> spot as sufficient <add>as well as <gap/> proper</add> for both establishments.</p> | |||
<p>As to this point, your Memorialist can not <lb/>take upon him, nor is it necessary, to say precisely<lb/> of what description the individuals were, whose<lb/> investments were meant to be included in the above<lb/> mentioned calculation of £200,000: whether it included<lb/> the whole number of individuals (at whatsoever<lb/> periods their respective investments had been made) who conceived themselves aggrieved: or whether <add>it included</add> such<lb/> only, whose investments had been made, at periods<lb/> subsequent to that, at which the taking possession of<lb/> the land for the purpose in question, became <lb/> known to have been suspended. Whichsoever of <lb/> these suppositions be the true one, it makes, with<lb/> respect to the justice of such claims, as your <add>memorialist</add></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
—stance of this very spot, when first fixed upon for a
Penitentiary House. Two places were fixed upon for
as many Penitentiary Houses: One in Wandsworth
Common Field for females: this at Battersea Rise
for males. People in Wandsworth were alarmed: people
in Battersea were alarmed: the judges disallowed
the choice of Wandsworth Field, not because
they considered the alarms of neighbourhoods as sufficient
grounds for negativing such a choice, (for if
they had they must have rejected this spot as well as the other) but because they regarded this one spot as sufficient as well as proper for both establishments.
As to this point, your Memorialist can not
take upon him, nor is it necessary, to say precisely
of what description the individuals were, whose
investments were meant to be included in the above
mentioned calculation of £200,000: whether it included
the whole number of individuals (at whatsoever
periods their respective investments had been made) who conceived themselves aggrieved: or whether it included such
only, whose investments had been made, at periods
subsequent to that, at which the taking possession of
the land for the purpose in question, became
known to have been suspended. Whichsoever of
these suppositions be the true one, it makes, with
respect to the justice of such claims, as your memorialist
|
Identifier: | JB/118/090/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
118 |
panopticon |
||
|
090 |
|||
|
003 |
|||
|
copy/fair copy sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f19 / f20 / f21 / f22 |
||
|
39144 |
|||
