★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<pb/><!-- t r a n s c r i p t i o n o f r e d i n k o n s o u r c e p a g e f o l l o w s --> | <pb/><!-- t r a n s c r i p t i o n o f r e d i n k o n s o u r c e p a g e f o l l o w s --> | ||
<hi rend='underline'>When</hi> this Law was published we know —- "it is coeval with Mankind." By whom we know likewise — it was by God himself. But where to whom, in what terms, we must apply to one Author to learn. As to the first questions; where this law was published and to whom; our author's | <hi rend='underline'>When</hi> this Law was published we know —- "it is coeval with Mankind." By whom we know likewise — it was by God himself. But where to whom, in what terms, we must apply to one Author to learn. As to the first questions; where this law was published and to whom; our author's | ||
account is not so clear as one could wish. But after well weighing what he is pleased to tell us, it comes out at last that it was not promulgated anywhere, or to any body. | account is not so clear as one could wish. But after well weighing what he is pleased to tell us, it comes out at last that it was not promulgated anywhere, or to any body. For speaking of <gap/> he says <gap/> p.42 "that the other (i.e. the Law of Nature) is only what by the <gap/>fance of human reason we <hi rend='underline'>imagine</hi> to be that Law." <hi rend='superscript'>that is the Law of God</hi> So when this law which was thus early <hi rend='underline'>dictated</hi> was | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
---page break---
When this Law was published we know —- "it is coeval with Mankind." By whom we know likewise — it was by God himself. But where to whom, in what terms, we must apply to one Author to learn. As to the first questions; where this law was published and to whom; our author's
account is not so clear as one could wish. But after well weighing what he is pleased to tell us, it comes out at last that it was not promulgated anywhere, or to any body. For speaking of he says p.42 "that the other (i.e. the Law of Nature) is only what by the fance of human reason we imagine to be that Law." that is the Law of God So when this law which was thus early dictated was
|
Identifier: | JB/096/005/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
|
005 |
|||
|
004 |
section ii / of the authors account of the laws of nature |
||
|
collectanea |
4 |
||
|
recto |
c15 / c16 / c17 / c18 |
||
|
168 |
[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]] |
||
|
[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]] |
31009 |
||
