★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<p>If it happens as it does often, that one word is in some part<lb/> | <p>If it happens as it does often, that one word is in some part<lb/> | ||
of an Act printed for another, immediately then comes out a<lb/> | of an Act printed for another, immediately then comes out a<lb/> | ||
new <add>fresh one</add> Act with all it's formalities & flourishes to alter it: the<lb/> | new <add>fresh one</add> Act with all <sic>it's</sic> formalities & flourishes to alter it: the<lb/> | ||
whole story is told over again once more in as many words<lb/> | whole story is told over again once more in as many words<lb/> | ||
as may be: & the Collection remains <add>is enacted</add> ornamented with—<lb/> | as may be: & the Collection remains <add>is enacted</add> ornamented with —<lb/> | ||
both of them <add>together</add>.</p> | both of them <add>together</add>.<lb/></p> | ||
I have now before me an Act <note>25.G.2.7</note> made to rectify another, <note>24.G.2.14 <add>which was</add> itself - made to explain<del>ing</del> & amend<del>ing</del> 21.G.2.32.</note> in which<lb/> | <p>I have now before me an Act <note>25.G.2.7</note> made to rectify another, <note>24.G.2.14 <add>which was</add> itself - made to explain<del>ing</del> & amend<del>ing</del> 21.G.2.32.</note> in which<lb/> | ||
unhappily an "or" had been inserted instead of an "and"—<lb/> | unhappily an "or" had been inserted instead of an "and"—<lb/> | ||
to put in one word was therefore the | to put in one word was therefore the business which the Act — <lb/> | ||
was to do — The preamble alone of the Statute which is to<lb/> | was to do — The preamble alone of the Statute which is to<lb/> | ||
do this contains between 5&600: what there is in the body<lb/> | do this contains between 5 & 600: what there is in the body<lb/> | ||
(as the Edition I have before me has not got it) I don't know.<pb/> | (as the Edition I have before me has not got it) I don't know.<pb/> | ||
< | <head>COMPOS. Stat. quâ Statutes. One with another |BR[|] Recapitulation in Rectifying Acts.</head> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
If it happens as it does often, that one word is in some part
of an Act printed for another, immediately then comes out a
new fresh one Act with all it's formalities & flourishes to alter it: the
whole story is told over again once more in as many words
as may be: & the Collection remains is enacted ornamented with —
both of them together.
I have now before me an Act 25.G.2.7 made to rectify another, 24.G.2.14 which was itself - made to explaining & amending 21.G.2.32. in which
unhappily an "or" had been inserted instead of an "and"—
to put in one word was therefore the business which the Act —
was to do — The preamble alone of the Statute which is to
do this contains between 5 & 600: what there is in the body
(as the Edition I have before me has not got it) I don't know.
---page break---
COMPOS. Stat. quâ Statutes. One with another |BR[|] Recapitulation in Rectifying Acts.
Identifier: | JB/070/082/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
070 |
of laws in general |
||
082 |
compos. stat. qua statutes one with another recapitulation in rectifying acts |
||
001 |
|||
copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
|||
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
|||
23197 |
|||