JB/096/054/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/054/004: Difference between revisions

some corrections
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>Known therefore it should seem it <hi rend='underline'>is</hi> already<lb/>
<p>Known therefore it should seem it <hi rend='underline'>is</hi> already
by myself: for one example; by our Author, for<lb/>
<lb/>
another: by the man that sweeps our Chimney's<lb/>
by myself: for one example; by our Author, for
for a third. [To begin with myself about whom<lb/>
<lb/>
I can be the surest, I protest upon the word of an hon-<lb/>-est
another: by the man that sweeps our Chimney's
man, I can not <add>find</add> by any of <del>the accounts I have</del> <add>the description given it</add><lb/>
<lb/>
<del>made written</del>, that there is any such thing at all.<lb/>
for a third. [To begin with myself about whom
If <hi rend='underline'>he</hi> knows what it consists of, I amongst many<lb/>
<lb/>
others would have been infinitely obliged to him<lb/>
I can be the surest, I protest upon the word of an honest
to have told us. This he has not done: probably<lb/>
<lb/>
for the reasons <del><gap/></del> <add>just</add> mentioned; <del>as not</del><lb/>
man, I can not <add>find</add> by any of <del>the accounts I have</del> <add>the description given it</add>
<del>thinking it worth his while.</del> <note><del>we are</del> <add>every man is</add> to conform to it <foreign><del><hi rend='underline'>nogus vogus</hi></del> <add>nolens volens</add>:</foreign> & so it was not worth while to tell us what it is.</note></p>
<lb/>
<add>[A sample of it, however,</add> He has given us. <del><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/></del> This<lb/>
<del>made written</del>, that there is any such thing at all.
sample consists of three principles: and they are these.<lb/>
<lb/>
1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> "We should <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>live honestly,<note>p.40</note></add>" 2<hi rend='superscript'>nd</hi>ly "we should hurt<lb/>
If <hi rend='underline'>he</hi> knows what it consists of, I amongst many
nobody;<note>p.40</note>" Thirdly, "we should render to every one his<lb/>
<lb/>
due."<note>p.40</note> <gap/> A pretty large sample <del><gap/></del> <add>too it</add> should seem<lb/>
others would have been infinitely obliged to him
to be; for Justinian says, that here is all of it:<lb/>
<lb/>
not only of <hi rend='underline'>it</hi> indeed, but of every thing that is known<lb/>
to have told us. This he has not done: probably
by the name of Law; <del>for "<hi rend='underline'>Jus</hi>" means <hi rend='underline'>Law</hi> <add></del> <del><gap/></del></add> of</lb>
<lb/>
the Merciful Law <add>therefore</add> among the rest. <add>if <hi rend='underline'>Jus</hi> means Law</add> Thus saith Justinian;<lb/>
for the reasons <del><gap/> here</del> <add>just</add> mentioned; <note><del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add><add>every</add> a man is</add> to conform to it <<del>foreign>nogus vegus</foreign></del> <add><foreign>nolens volens</foreign></add> &amp; <!-- horizontal line --> so it was not worth while to tell us what it is</note> <del>as not</del>
<lb/>
<del>thinking it worth his while.</del>
</p>
 
 
<p><add>[A sample of it, however,</add> He has given us. <del><gap/><gap/> <gap/> longer</del> <add><gap/> <gap/></add> This
<lb/>
sample consists of three principles: and they are these.
<lb/>
1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> "We should <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>live honestly," <note>p.40</note></add> 2<hi rend='superscript'>nd</hi>ly "we should hurt<lb/>
nobody;" <note>p.40</note> thirdly, "we should render to every one his
<lb/>
due." <note>p.40</note> <del>For</del> A pretty large sample <del><gap/></del> <add>too it</add> should seem
<lb/>
to be; for Justinian says, that here is all of it:
<lb/>
not only of <hi rend='underline'>it</hi> indeed, but of every thing that is known
<lb/>
by the name of Law; <del>for "<hi rend='underline'>Jus</hi>" means <hi rend='underline'>Law</hi> <add></del> <del><unclear>but</unclear> is</del></add> of
</lb>
the Municipal Law <add>therefore</add> among the rest. <add>if <hi rend='underline'>Jus</hi> means Law</add> Thus saith Justinian;
<lb/>
and with Justinian the <add>our</add> author finds<lb/>
and with Justinian the <add>our</add> author finds<lb/>
no fault. <del><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/>says that there is not</del> Not that he will allow it to be all, rather;<lb/>
no fault. <del>our Author however says that this is not</del> <add>Not that he will allow it to be all, rather;</add>
<del><gap/><gap/></del> <add>since</add> there are "others"<note>p.40</note> that he knows of.<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>What these others are</add>, How <del><gap/></del> great our obligations to him, had he told<lb/>
<del><gap/><gap/></del> <add>since</add> there are "others" <note>p.40</note> that he knows of.
us! There are but three: more than so many again<lb/>
<lb/>
there could <del><gap/></del> <add>not surely</add> be. So great an Emperor as Justinian,<lb/>
<add>What these others are</add>, How <del><gap/></del> great our obligation to him, had he told
an Emperor whose words are made authority,<pb/>
<lb/>
us! There are but three: more than so many again
<lb/>
there could <del><gap/></del> <add>not surely</add> be. So great an Emperor as Justinian,
<lb/>
an Emperor whose words are made authority,</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:28, 10 January 2011

Click Here To Edit

Known therefore it should seem it is already
by myself: for one example; by our Author, for
another: by the man that sweeps our Chimney's
for a third. [To begin with myself about whom
I can be the surest, I protest upon the word of an honest
man, I can not find by any of the accounts I have the description given it
made written, that there is any such thing at all.
If he knows what it consists of, I amongst many
others would have been infinitely obliged to him
to have told us. This he has not done: probably
for the reasons here just mentioned; <add>every a man is</add> to conform to it <foreign>nogus vegus</foreign> nolens volens & so it was not worth while to tell us what it is as not
thinking it worth his while.


[A sample of it, however, He has given us. longer This
sample consists of three principles: and they are these.
1st "We should live honestly," p.40 2ndly "we should hurt
nobody;" p.40 thirdly, "we should render to every one his
due." p.40 For A pretty large sample too it should seem
to be; for Justinian says, that here is all of it:
not only of it indeed, but of every thing that is known
by the name of Law; for "Jus" means Law <add> but is</add> of </lb> the Municipal Law therefore among the rest. if Jus means Law Thus saith Justinian;
and with Justinian the our author finds
no fault. our Author however says that this is not Not that he will allow it to be all, rather;
since there are "others" p.40 that he knows of.
What these others are, How great our obligation to him, had he told
us! There are but three: more than so many again
there could not surely be. So great an Emperor as Justinian,
an Emperor whose words are made authority,



Identifier: | JB/096/054/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

054

Info in main headings field

sect. ii law of nature

Image

004

Titles

note

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / / /

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[motif] [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31058

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in