JB/096/333/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:10, 1 January 2011

DISSENT BR9 CONFLICTUS LEGUM. 1 Comm. 90.

One of the most redoubtable arguments in a paper
circulated among the members of the House of Lords against
the Bill for the Relief of the Dissenters, [v. Publ. Ads. for
Saturday [23o 2] of May 1772 is that it would be contrary to several Acts of Parliament. It is then applied indeed
only to the matter of expediency, & not of right: tho' in questionable reading
is its questionable reading the questionable reading

Luckily Cicero has spoken treated of this conceit, as
Author of the Commentaries observes, with the contempt it
merits deserves: And Cicero was an eloquent Orator, a Roman, &
lived 1800 years ago.— Those arguments which will weigh with
with when no others will.

---page break---

A4

DISSENTERS - Penal Laws

Who are these men, thatto take they should take upon them to
impose this stigma of this thraldom on men loyal as themselves,
peaceable as themselves, and (to descend ascend from there
negative qualities which expects from its' members as
matters of obligation, to those positive ones which it
honours in them as matters of ) learned as themselves,
in every respect their equals, except (that in
which may pardon their inferiority) in not being as
themselves?

Identifier: \| JB/096/333/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	096	Main Headings	legislation
Folio number	333	Info in main headings field	dissenters penal laws
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f4
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::<…>onig [partial motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer	cc1
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	31337
Box Contents

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Luckily Cicero has <del>spoken</del> <add>treated</add> of this conceit, as<lb/>Author of the Commentaries observes, with the contempt it<lb/> merits <add>deserves:</add> And Cicero was an eloquent Orator, a Roman, &amp;<lb/>
-lived 1800 years ago.&#x2014; Those arguments which will weigh with<lb/>with with when no others will.
+lived 1800 years ago.&#x2014; Those arguments which will weigh with<lb/>with when no others will.
 <pb/>
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 DISSENTERS - Penal Laws</head>
-Who are these men, that<add>to take</add> they should take upon them to<lb/>impose this stigma of this <sic>thraldom</sic> on men loyal as themselves,<lb/> peaceable as themselves, and (to descend <add>ascend</add> from there<lb/><gap/> <add>negative qualities</add> which <gap/> expcts from its' members as<lb/>matters of obligation, to those positive ones which it<lb/><gap/> in them as matters of <gap/>) learned as themsevles,<lb/>in every respect their equals, except (that in<lb/>which may pardon their inferiority) in not being <gap/> as<lb/>themselves?
+Who are these men, that<add>to take</add> they should take upon them to<lb/>impose this stigma of this <sic>thraldom</sic> on men loyal as themselves,<lb/> peaceable as themselves, and (to descend <add>ascend</add> from there<lb/><gap/> <add>negative qualities</add> which <gap/> expects from its' members as<lb/>matters of obligation, to those positive ones which it<lb/>honours in them as matters of <gap/>) learned as themselves,<lb/>in every respect their equals, except (that in<lb/>which may pardon their inferiority) in not being <gap/> as<lb/>themselves?
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Views

JB/096/333/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:10, 1 January 2011

Navigation

Search