JB/169/249/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/169/249/002: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


<p>By how much <del>greater</del> would the Country have been the<lb/>
<p>By how much <del>greater</del> would the Country have been the<lb/>
better, if instead of thus volunteering himself to preven the enemy<lb/>
better, if instead of thus volunteering himself to prevent the enemy<lb/>
from invading it, he had cautiously lain by, &amp; for want of the advice<lb/>
from invading it, he had cautiously lain by, &amp; for want of the advice<lb/>
in question, suffered them to <del>have carried</del> <add>carry</add> their projects into effect?</p>
in question, suffered them to <del>have carried</del> <add>carry</add> their projects into effect?</p>
<p>Which is the best subject, he who at the hazard of every thing<lb/>
<p>Which is the best subject, he who at the hazard of every thing<lb/>
that is or ought to be dear to a man, exerts himself to save his<lb/>
that is or ought to be dear to a man, exerts himself to save his<lb/>
Line 17: Line 18:
&#x2014; but what I ask is &#x2014; who is the most public spirited man,<lb/>
&#x2014; but what I ask is &#x2014; who is the most public spirited man,<lb/>
the most loyal subject?</p>
the most loyal subject?</p>
<p><hi rend="underline">Oh, but there was something in the stile of the advice which<lb/> bespoke a well wisher to those to whom it was given</hi>&#x2014; I daresay <lb/>
<p><hi rend="underline">Oh, but there was something in the stile of the advice which<lb/> bespoke a well wisher to those to whom it was given</hi>&#x2014; I daresay <lb/>
there was &#x2014; I am sure there was &#x2014; for that M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan is no<lb/>
there was &#x2014; I am sure there was &#x2014; for that M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan is no<lb/>
idiot, I am sure. But an idiot must that man be, &amp; surely<lb/>
idiot, I am sure. But an idiot must that man be, &amp; surely<lb/>
the most unprecedented of all <sic>ideots</sic>, who should have expected ad-<lb/>
the most unprecedented of all <sic>ideots</sic>, who should have expected advice<lb/>
-vice to have its effect, if the person giving it appeared in any<lb/>
to have its effect, if the person giving it appeared in any<lb/>
other character than that of a well-wisher to those to who<lb/>
other character than that of a well-wisher to those to who<lb/>
he gave it.</p>
he gave it.</p>
<p>I can tell you more, Sir &#x2014; M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan not only eappeared<lb/>
 
<p>I can tell you more, Sir &#x2014; M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan not only appeared<lb/>
to be, but was, &amp; is still, I am well assured, a well wisher to France.<lb/>
to be, but was, &amp; is still, I am well assured, a well wisher to France.<lb/>
I wish it were in my power to be as much of a well-wisher to<lb/>
I wish it were in my power to be as much of a well-wisher to<lb/>
France as I believe him to be. It is impossible M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan<lb/>
France as I believe him to be. It is impossible M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan<lb/>
should not be a well-wisher to France. He is a well-wisher, he is<lb/>
should not be a well-wisher to France. He is a well-wisher, he is<lb/>
a friend &amp; a more zealous &amp; active one, perhaps <unclear>scarcebreathes</unclear> &#x2014;<lb/>
a friend &amp; a more zealous &amp; active one, perhaps scarce breathes &#x2014;<lb/>
to all mankind. He is a well-wisher to France as Christ<lb/>
to all mankind. He is a well-wisher to France as Christ<lb/>
has commanded him to be, &amp; as Christ in his place would<lb/>
has commanded him to be, &amp; as Christ in his place would<lb/>
have been, a well-wisher &amp; benefactor to the deniers of his name.<lb/>
have been, a well-wisher &amp; benefactor to the deniers of his name.<lb/>
The question I presume is &#x2014; not whether he was a well-wisher</p>
The question I presume is &#x2014; not whether he was a well-wisher<lb/>
<add>to</add>
<add>to</add></p>





Revision as of 08:36, 4 April 2014

Click Here To Edit

By how much greater would the Country have been the
better, if instead of thus volunteering himself to prevent the enemy
from invading it, he had cautiously lain by, & for want of the advice
in question, suffered them to have carried carry their projects into effect?

Which is the best subject, he who at the hazard of every thing
that is or ought to be dear to a man, exerts himself to save his
Country, & that in a way bidding as fair as possible for efficacy,
or he who for want of such exertions chooses to let the country take
its chance? I know who is the more prudent man of the two—
taking selfishness & nothing else into the account of prudence
I know who in this sense is the more prudent man —the
treatment Mr Vaughan has met with shews it but too plainly—
— but what I ask is — who is the most public spirited man,
the most loyal subject?

Oh, but there was something in the stile of the advice which
bespoke a well wisher to those to whom it was given
— I daresay
there was — I am sure there was — for that Mr Vaughan is no
idiot, I am sure. But an idiot must that man be, & surely
the most unprecedented of all ideots, who should have expected advice
to have its effect, if the person giving it appeared in any
other character than that of a well-wisher to those to who
he gave it.

I can tell you more, Sir — Mr Vaughan not only appeared
to be, but was, & is still, I am well assured, a well wisher to France.
I wish it were in my power to be as much of a well-wisher to
France as I believe him to be. It is impossible Mr Vaughan
should not be a well-wisher to France. He is a well-wisher, he is
a friend & a more zealous & active one, perhaps scarce breathes —
to all mankind. He is a well-wisher to France as Christ
has commanded him to be, & as Christ in his place would
have been, a well-wisher & benefactor to the deniers of his name.
The question I presume is — not whether he was a well-wisher
to




Identifier: | JB/169/249/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 169.

Date_1

1796-02-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

169

Main Headings

Folio number

249

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

57069

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in