★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<!-- in red -->in another place,<add>+</add> <note>+ Vol.1.p.57.</note> <del>our Author | <!-- in red -->in another place,<add>+</add> <note>+ Vol.1.p.57.</note> <del>our Author | ||
</del> <add>he</add> declares this to be<lb/> the strict sense of obligation.<lb/> | </del> <add>he</add> declares this to be<lb/> the strict sense of obligation.<lb/> | ||
<!-- In Brown -->agent. Could he with any propriety, say, that<lb/> | |||
<!-- In red -->Hence I suppose <del>it is that</del> he tells us <del>here</del> - that<lb/> | |||
<!-- in brown -->the is bound, is under an obligation, to<lb/> | |||
<!-- in red -->"Man, considered as a Creature, must | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
Or perhaps we mistake our Author's meaning. by We
supposeng the idea of obligation to imply a power of choice, a
misled by sound, as to imagine that the action
power of doing or not doing; whereas our Author means all the while
that we are not bounden by the Laws of another unless they do by
of the stone, which he drops from his hand, is
some natural violence so constrain us, as to render it impossible
for us to act otherwise than as they direct us. And indeed
the same kind of action as the action of a free
in another place,+ + Vol.1.p.57. our Author
he declares this to be
the strict sense of obligation.
agent. Could he with any propriety, say, that
Hence I suppose it is that he tells us here - that
the is bound, is under an obligation, to
"Man, considered as a Creature, must
Identifier: | JB/096/001/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
001 |
|||
003 |
section i / account of laws in general |
||
collectanea |
4 |
||
recto |
c1 f1 / c2 / c3 / c4 |
||
168 |
[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]] |
||
31005 |
|||