JB/096/328/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/328/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/328/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/328/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>DISSENTERS Penal Laws</head><lb/><note>I leave those who have profited by it to x in <add>such as</add> the x</note> <p> I can only believe because it x with the ordinary <del>effects</del> <add>manifestations</add> of the spirit of Technical  <add>Systematical</add><lb/>Theology, that there are not wanting men, withheld? out of the establishment, who sooner than lose<lb/> the chance of seeing their enemies suffer, would expose themselves to suffer with them<lb/><note> Bad if <unclear>united</unclear> <unclear>front</unclear> by the sense of <unclear><del>common</del></unclear> danger</note> but I must own myself somewhat less credulous as to their zeal to continue exposed granted to<lb/> the perils of persecution; because this sort at least of fanaticism is not much in vogue.<lb/> <note>When the x &amp; equal spirit of x wisdom</note> If however they be indeed x, it will <add>would be easy to find out a method</add> be the easiest of all matters to content them, and<lb/><note> Who as they have not x to do in all past time, it will thus not in all future to dispute x by x the  generous? on which the battles? of the annoyance of their enemies are x</note>  I have<add> x</add> too much indulgence for appetites the most depraved? when they which <add>the interests of x x</add><del>do not</del> injure <add>not</add> the<lb/> interests of Society, to impose? <add>this prohibition</add> <del>for</del> to gratify<del>cation</del> them in this: <lb/> Let <del>freedom</del> security be given to those who love it for themselves and others, &amp; let those <unclear>lapped</unclear> in<lb/> be exempted from it by name. To each will there be rendered what the severally x:<lb/> Servitude to whom servitude is acceptable, freedom to whom freedom.</p><note> The Policy of defending one of those four? bonds of dependency which yet retain x their hold</note> I can blame without wondering at the x of the Americans<lb/> <pb/>  <note>What the Church of Rome has been to the Church of England, the Church of England is to the Americans</note> The excellent Locke+<!-- see marginal note: "+Letter to a person of quality. fr" others)"  --> speaks of the Divines of his times (and indeed as be there obvious of all<lb/>// as the location? of all mischief// Those of our own, having it no longer in their power to hatch mischief, content themselves<lb/> with opposing good. <note></note>
 





Revision as of 20:40, 4 January 2011

Click Here To Edit

DISSENTERS Penal Laws
I leave those who have profited by it to x in such as the x

I can only believe because it x with the ordinary effects manifestations of the spirit of Technical Systematical
Theology, that there are not wanting men, withheld? out of the establishment, who sooner than lose
the chance of seeing their enemies suffer, would expose themselves to suffer with them
Bad if united front by the sense of common danger but I must own myself somewhat less credulous as to their zeal to continue exposed granted to
the perils of persecution; because this sort at least of fanaticism is not much in vogue.
When the x & equal spirit of x wisdom If however they be indeed x, it will would be easy to find out a method be the easiest of all matters to content them, and
Who as they have not x to do in all past time, it will thus not in all future to dispute x by x the generous? on which the battles? of the annoyance of their enemies are x I have x too much indulgence for appetites the most depraved? when they which the interests of x xdo not injure not the
interests of Society, to impose? this prohibition for to gratifycation them in this:
Let freedom security be given to those who love it for themselves and others, & let those lapped in
be exempted from it by name. To each will there be rendered what the severally x:
Servitude to whom servitude is acceptable, freedom to whom freedom.

The Policy of defending one of those four? bonds of dependency which yet retain x their hold I can blame without wondering at the x of the Americans

---page break---
What the Church of Rome has been to the Church of England, the Church of England is to the Americans The excellent Locke+ speaks of the Divines of his times (and indeed as be there obvious of all
// as the location? of all mischief// Those of our own, having it no longer in their power to hatch mischief, content themselves
with opposing good.




Identifier: | JB/096/328/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

legislation

Folio number

328

Info in main headings field

dissenters penal laws

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31332

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in