JB/096/167/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/167/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/167/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/167/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''


<head>PUNISHMENT <add>it's END</add> KEYMIS <!-- "There is at least one  
<head>PUNISHMENT <add>it's END</add> KEYMIS <!-- "There is at least one  
lesser but not negligible figure to be reckoned with – Henry Home, Lord Kames  
lesser but not negligible figure to be reckoned with – Henry Home, Lord Kames  
(1696-1782).  It is certainly the case that Bentham refers approvingly to Kames on  
(1696-1782).  It is certainly the case that Bentham refers approvingly to Kames on  
several occasions in his early writings (and we need not attach too much significance  
several occasions in his early writings (and we need not attach too much significance  
to the fact the consistently misspelt the name as ‘Keymis’).  Kames’s Historical Law  
to the fact the consistently misspelt the name as ‘Keymis’).  Kames’s Historical Law  
Tracts (1758) do seem to have made a favourable impression on Bentham...." J.H. Burns, "Bentham and the Scots,"5. http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/658/1/9.5burns_scots.pdf --> VINDICTIVE PRINCIPLE</head><lb/> <p>"Upon certain actions hurtful to others the <gap/> of<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>impropriety</hi> &amp; <hi rend='underline'>wrong</hi> is impressed in Character <gap/><lb/> to all, not excepting the delinquent." If <add>it is</add> hereby <del>the</del><lb/> <del>Author</del> means, that certain actions are generally &amp;<lb/> readily perceived to be hurtful to others it is true<lb/> &amp; it is from conceiving <add>perceiving or <gap/></add> that our indignation  <add>judgment of his guilt</add> <add><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/></add> is produced<lb/> if it be any thing more than a confused<lb/> and <gap/> <gap/> disapprobation.</p> <note>When we can give any reason for it, that is the reason &amp; no other.</note><pb/><!-- Here the page is extended by the addition of separate sheet (pinned or stitched? to the first. --><note> The treatment of a good man, that is of a man who has tuned his feelings in unison with the <add><gap/></add> public interest, or rather <gap/> <add>it is the natural inconsistency of men &amp; the impossibility<lb/> of entertaining? an underx  adherence? to the con?nexion<lb/> he has taken up that saves him</add> + v. Keymis Hist/ of the Criminal Law that would be to be always in the right, with that of public opinion or the yet <gap/> <add> voices of</add> religion, which is always to mean to be so the <gap/> of such a man &amp; <gap/>, rises at the sight of <gap/>: but --- I know that when a man is angry, he wishes to be thought to be in the right: but I should not have thought in cold blood of saying that he must be so.</note><add>
Tracts (1758) do seem to have made a favourable impression on Bentham...." J.H. Burns, "Bentham and the Scots,"5. http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/658/1/9.5burns_scots.pdf -->VINDICTIVE PRINCIPLE</head><lb/> <p> "Upon certain actions hurtful to others the stamp of<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>impropriety</hi> &amp; <hi rend='underline'>wrong</hi> is impressed in Character <gap/><lb/> to all, not excepting the delinquent." If <add>it is</add> hereby <del>the</del><lb/> <del>Author</del> means, that certain actions are generally &amp; <lb/> readily perceived to be hurtful to others it is true<lb/> &amp; it is from conceiving <add>perceiving or <gap/></add> that our indignation  <add>judgment of his guilt</add> <add><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/></add> is produced<lb/> if it be any thing more than a confused <lb/> and <gap/> <gap/> disapprobation. </p> <note>When we can give any reason for it, that is the reason &amp; no other.</note> <pb/> <!-- Here the page is extended by the addition of separate sheet (pinned or stitched? to the first. --><note>
<head> PUNISHMENT It's END</head> // <p>Resentment is a criticism of right &amp; wrong &amp; why? + because<lb/> it usually follows an action prejudicial to the Interest<lb/> of Society &#x2014; but suppose it produced by an action not<lb/> mischievous? Is it then a criticism of right &amp; wrong?<lb/> no surely &#x2014; <del>or else</del> what <add>else</add> do we mean by an unjust<lb/> resentment</p> They all faulty x or refer to some enough ? other which x x <lb/>  Unless whenever a man is angry,  fault? appeared? of all the facts<lb/> for I will do it justice if he is in the right, resentment can never<lb/> be a fit criticism/criterion to be <gap/> to.
<head> PUNISHMENT It's END</head><lb/>  Resentment is a criticism of right &amp; wrong &amp; why? + because<lb/> it usually follows an action prejudicial to the Interest<lb/> of Society &#x2014; but suppose it produced by an action not<lb/> mischievous? Is it then a criticism of right &amp; wrong?<lb/> no surely &#x2014; <del>or else</del> what <add>else</add> do we mean by an unjust<lb/> resentment<lb/>  <note>The treatment of a good man, that is of a man who has tuned his feelings in unison with the <add><gap/></add> public interest, or rather <gap/> <add>it is the natural inconsistency of men &amp; the impossibility<lb/> of entertaining? an underx  adherence? to the con?nexion<lb/> he has taken up that saves him</add> + v. Keymis Hist/ of the Criminal Law that would be to be always in the right, with that of public opinion or the yet <gap/> <add> voices of</add> religion, which is always to mean to be so the <gap/> of such a man &amp; <gap/>, rises at the sight of <gap/>: but --- I know that when a man is angry, he wishes to be thought to be in the right: but I should not have thought in cold blood of saying that he must be so. They all <unclear>faulty</unclear> <gap/> or refer to some <add>enough</add> After which it <gap/>  Unless whenever a man is angry,  <unclear>fault</unclear> <unclear>appeared</unclear> of all the facts for I will do it justice if he is in the right, resentment can never be a fit criticism/criterion to be <gap/> to. </note>
PUNISHMENT END. False - Vengeance - Keymis.
PUNISHMENT END. False - Vengeance - Keymis.



Revision as of 10:29, 6 January 2011

Click Here To Edit

PUNISHMENT it's END KEYMIS VINDICTIVE PRINCIPLE

"Upon certain actions hurtful to others the stamp of
impropriety & wrong is impressed in Character
to all, not excepting the delinquent." If it is hereby the
Author means, that certain actions are generally &
readily perceived to be hurtful to others it is true
& it is from conceiving perceiving or that our indignation judgment of his guilt is produced
if it be any thing more than a confused
and disapprobation.

When we can give any reason for it, that is the reason & no other.
---page break---

PUNISHMENT It's END
Resentment is a criticism of right & wrong & why? + because
it usually follows an action prejudicial to the Interest
of Society — but suppose it produced by an action not
mischievous? Is it then a criticism of right & wrong?
no surely — or else what else do we mean by an unjust
resentment
<note>The treatment of a good man, that is of a man who has tuned his feelings in unison with the public interest, or rather it is the natural inconsistency of men & the impossibility
of entertaining? an underx adherence? to the con?nexion
he has taken up that saves him
+ v. Keymis Hist/ of the Criminal Law that would be to be always in the right, with that of public opinion or the yet voices of religion, which is always to mean to be so the of such a man & , rises at the sight of : but --- I know that when a man is angry, he wishes to be thought to be in the right: but I should not have thought in cold blood of saying that he must be so. They all faulty or refer to some enough After which it Unless whenever a man is angry, fault appeared of all the facts for I will do it justice if he is in the right, resentment can never be a fit criticism/criterion to be to. PUNISHMENT END. False - Vengeance - Keymis.




Identifier: | JB/096/167/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

167

Info in main headings field

punishment end false vengeance keymis

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial initials]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31171

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in