JB/537/164/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/537/164/002: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
in: besides, supposing the subject to be entirely the<lb/>
in: besides, supposing the subject to be entirely the<lb/>
same, there was no necessity why I must transcribe<lb/>
same, there was no necessity why I must transcribe<lb/>
out of that Book. I asked him whether he had any other<lb/>
objection? No. whether he could recommend to me any o-<lb/>
-ther subject he thought more proper? No. well, I must<lb/>
do as I pleased, he did not know what to say to it.</p>
<p>





Revision as of 18:28, 20 April 2014

Click Here To Edit

pleased; he said theire was a Copy of Verses on the same
Subject as mine in the Musae Anglicana; I answered,
that could be no prejudice to me, as I have a greater
diversity of matter to work on thatn that Author could
have, from what has happened since the time he wrote
in: besides, supposing the subject to be entirely the
same, there was no necessity why I must transcribe
out of that Book. I asked him whether he had any other
objection? No. whether he could recommend to me any o-
-ther subject he thought more proper? No. well, I must
do as I pleased, he did not know what to say to it.

Identifier: | JB/537/164/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 537.

Date_1

1763-04-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

537

Main Headings

Folio number

164

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in