JB/073/083/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/073/083/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/073/083/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/073/083/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>C<lb/></head>
 
<head>Simple Personal Injuries</head>


<p>Where the quantity of damage which was intended is the<lb/>
very quantity which eventually ensues, the act may be said<lb/>
to be adequately intentional with respect to its consequences;<lb/>
when not so much, inadequately; when more,<lb/>
more than adequately</p>
<note>Example</note> <p>You intended for instance to strike the porter,<lb/>
<add>whose leg you have broken. If</add> <del>If</del> your intention was to strike him in the leg in such<lb/>
manner that he might be obliged to have it cut off, or if<lb/>
you intended to strike him in the fore-arm in such manner<lb/>
that he might be obliged to have his fore-arm cut off, and the<lb/>
case is that the damage he would suffer from the loss of a<lb/>
leg would not be materially greater or less than what he<lb/>
would suffer from the loss of a fore-arm, in either of these<lb/>
cases the act was adequately intention with regards to<lb/>
the quality of damage.</p>
<note> <!-- addition in pencil, very faint --> was compounded <gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/> fall short of <gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/></note>    If your intention was only to <hi rend='underline'>hurt</hi> him in the fore-arm<lb/>
or the leg without depriving him of either, the act<lb/>
was inad<add>e</add>quately intentional: if your intention was to<lb/>
deprive him of his thigh or the whole of his arm the act<lb/>
<add>was-</add> <pb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 02:55, 10 January 2011

Click Here To Edit

C
Simple Personal Injuries

Where the quantity of damage which was intended is the
very quantity which eventually ensues, the act may be said
to be adequately intentional with respect to its consequences;
when not so much, inadequately; when more,
more than adequately

Example

You intended for instance to strike the porter,
whose leg you have broken. If If your intention was to strike him in the leg in such
manner that he might be obliged to have it cut off, or if
you intended to strike him in the fore-arm in such manner
that he might be obliged to have his fore-arm cut off, and the
case is that the damage he would suffer from the loss of a
leg would not be materially greater or less than what he
would suffer from the loss of a fore-arm, in either of these
cases the act was adequately intention with regards to
the quality of damage.

was compounded fall short of If your intention was only to hurt him in the fore-arm
or the leg without depriving him of either, the act
was inadequately intentional: if your intention was to
deprive him of his thigh or the whole of his arm the act
was-
---page break---



Identifier: | JB/073/083/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

073

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

083

Info in main headings field

simple personal injuries

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23923

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in