JB/096/055/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/055/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


Precept 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi>


<head>5</head>
<head>SECT.II. Law of Nature.</head>
<head>SECT.II. Law of Nature.</head>
Precept 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi>. not give pain to any one<add> at all</add>: which would puzzle us<lb/>
 
what to think about the several professions of the<lb/>
 
Judge, the Surgeon, the Soldier and the Hangman;<lb/>
 
or that we should not give pain to any <del> man</del> <add>one</add> but<lb/>
 
when we ought: which would puzzle us to find any<lb/>
<p><note>Precept 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi></note> not give pain to any one <add> at all</add>: which would puzzle us
thing in this <unclear>ingenious/ingrevous</unclear> precept that could serve a man<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>any body</del> <del><gap/>one</del> for a rule.<lb/>
what to think about the several professions of the
Precept 3<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi>. Of the 3<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> <add>and last</add> the meaning<add> "render every one his due"</add> I suppose is, either that we<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>should</del> <add>ought to</add> render to every <del>one</del> <add>man</add> what we <hi rend='underline'>ought</hi> to render<lb/>
Judge, the Surgeon, the Soldier and the Hangman;
him (for this edifying and instructive sense is the<lb/>
<lb/>
only one that belongs incontestibly to any of them)<lb/>
or that we should not give pain to any <del>man</del> <add>one</add> but
or else that we should forbear to<del><gap/>deleted text</del> upon but <unclear>property</unclear><lb/>
<lb/>
that is to withold from him what the Law, namely<lb/>
when we ought: which would puzzle us to find any
the Municipal Law,<del> has given him;</del> whether in<lb/>
<lb/>
confirmation of <del>our own <gap/></del> <add>any undertakings of our own</add>, or upon any other<lb/>
thing in this ingenious precept that could serve a man
<unclear>title</unclear> <add>has bestowd on him:</add> for if a man has <hi rend='underline'>property</hi> in a thing, it is<lb/>
<lb/>
because the Municipal Law punishes others for<lb/>
<del>any body</del> <del>man</del> for a rule.</p>
<del>doing that with</del> <add>so dealing with</add> that thing,<del> which</del> as it permits <hi rend='underline'>him</hi><lb/>
 
to deal with it.<lb/>
 
We now know what the greatest part of it consists of<lb/>
<p><note>Precept 3<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi>.</note> [Of the 3<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> <add>and last</add> the meaning <add> "render every one his due"</add> I suppose is, either that we
<add>to wit</add>, probably, as much as comes to nothing; {and no more.}<lb/>
<lb/>
perhaps also <add>besides this</add>, a part of that <add>same thing called</add> Municipal Law, to<lb/>
<del>should</del> <add>ought to</add> render to every <del>one</del> <add>man</add> what we <hi rend='underline'>ought</hi> to render
which it stands opposed, <del>[and]</del>which was not to be<lb/>
<lb/>
understood without it: <add>and</add> which depends upon this and<lb/>
him (for this edifying and instructive sense is the
another; that is, as we shall <add>see</add> presently, the same;<lb/>
<lb/>
the <add>Divine Law, alias</add> Law of Revelation: depending therefore partly upon<lb/>
only one that belongs incontestably to any of them)
a part of itself, and partly upon nothing.<lb/>
<lb/>
Knowing this much of it as we do, we cannot choose<lb/>
or else that we should forbear to <del>violate</del> <add>trespass upon</add> upon but property
but acknowledge with our Author, that it is <add><gap/>added text</add> superior<lb/>
<lb/>
---page break---
that is to withold from him what the Law, namely
<lb/>
the Municipal Law, <del>has given him;</del> whether in
<lb/>
confirmation of <del>our own <unclear>importance</unclear></del> <add>any undertakings of our own</add>, or upon any other
<lb/>
<unclear>title</unclear> <add>has <sic>bestowd</sic> on him:</add> for if a man has <hi rend='underline'>property</hi> in a thing, it is
<lb/>
because the Municipal Law punishes others for
<lb/>
<del>doing that with</del> <add>so dealing with</add> that thing, <del>which</del> as it permits <hi rend='underline'>him</hi>
<lb/>
to deal with it.</p>
 
<p>We now know what the greatest part of it consists of
<lb/>
<add>to wit,</add> probably, as much as comes to nothing; [and no more.]
<lb/>
perhaps also <add>besides this</add>, a part of that <add>same thing called</add> Municipal Law, to
<lb/>
which it stands opposed, <del>[and]</del> which was not to be
<lb/>
understood without it: <add>and</add> which depends upon this and
<lb/>
another; that is, as we shall <add>see</add> presently, the same;
<lb/>
the <add>Divine Law, alias</add> Law of Revelation: depending therefore partly upon
<lb/>
a part of itself, and partly upon nothing.</p>
 
<p>Knowing this much of it as we do, we cannot choose
<lb/>
but acknowledge with our Author, that it is <add><unclear>the</unclear></add> superior</p>
 





Revision as of 14:42, 10 January 2011

Click Here To Edit


5 SECT.II. Law of Nature.



Precept 2d not give pain to any one at all: which would puzzle us
what to think about the several professions of the
Judge, the Surgeon, the Soldier and the Hangman;
or that we should not give pain to any man one but
when we ought: which would puzzle us to find any
thing in this ingenious precept that could serve a man
any body man for a rule.


Precept 3d. [Of the 3d and last the meaning "render every one his due" I suppose is, either that we
should ought to render to every one man what we ought to render
him (for this edifying and instructive sense is the
only one that belongs incontestably to any of them)
or else that we should forbear to violate trespass upon upon but property
that is to withold from him what the Law, namely
the Municipal Law, has given him; whether in
confirmation of our own importance any undertakings of our own, or upon any other
title has bestowd on him: for if a man has property in a thing, it is
because the Municipal Law punishes others for
doing that with so dealing with that thing, which as it permits him
to deal with it.

We now know what the greatest part of it consists of
to wit, probably, as much as comes to nothing; [and no more.]
perhaps also besides this, a part of that same thing called Municipal Law, to
which it stands opposed, [and] which was not to be
understood without it: and which depends upon this and
another; that is, as we shall see presently, the same;
the Divine Law, alias Law of Revelation: depending therefore partly upon
a part of itself, and partly upon nothing.

Knowing this much of it as we do, we cannot choose
but acknowledge with our Author, that it is the superior




Identifier: | JB/096/055/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

055

Info in main headings field

sect. ii law of nature

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / / / d8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31059

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in