JB/044/130/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/044/130/001: Difference between revisions

Robmagin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Robmagin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
<p>Evil 3-1. Age of the functionary not less than 30 years&#x2014;<lb/> while the age of a member of the House of Representatives <lb/> need not be more than 25.</p>
<p>Evil 3-1. Age of the functionary not less than 30 years&#x2014;<lb/> while the age of a member of the House of Representatives <lb/> need not be more than 25.</p>
<p><del>The reduction</del> <add><del>less</del> Even tho restriction</add> in the case of the House of<lb/>Representatives <add>tho' so much less close,</add> seems to be unwarranted: &amp; if pernicious<lb/> <del>upon the whole</del>, <add>even in that case,</add> in the case of the Senate it cannot<lb/> but be still more pernicious.</p>
<p><del>The reduction</del> <add><del>less</del> Even tho restriction</add> in the case of the House of<lb/>Representatives <add>tho' so much less close,</add> seems to be unwarranted: &amp; if pernicious<lb/> <del>upon the whole</del>, <add>even in that case,</add> in the case of the Senate it cannot<lb/> but be still more pernicious.</p>
<p><add>In the opinion</add> <del>The persons- the Electors</del> <add>of the Electors</add> to whom <del>a name is known</del> <add>the <add>individual</add> <add><del>man</del></add> <add> is personally</add> <lb/>he is not upon the whole unapt; though short of the<lb/> she antecedently to which, in the opinion of the<lb/>legislator in question, on the part of the average of<lb/> such persons as are capable of being chosen, <lb/>aptitude is not so probably as inaptitude, still in<lb/> the opinion of the only Judges who have the<lb/> means of observation, he is really apt. Whence<lb/> come so <del><gap/></del> <add>peremptory</add> a decision? Is it that<lb/> general presumption is an apter ground for action<lb/> than particular observation. No: but that on<lb/> this occasion the legislators themselves were<lb/> unapt were led astray by <del>an error</del> <add>a propensity- an error</add> (the causes<lb/> of which <add>see</add> below,) by self-conceit, by a <add>sort of</add> weakness<lb/> which is the ca<add>u</add>se of <del><unclear>silly</unclear></del> legislat<del>ors</del><add>ion</add> in<lb/> many instances beside this.</p>
<p><add>In the opinion</add> <del>The persons- the Electors</del> <add>of the Electors</add> to whom <del>a man is known</del> <add>the <add>individual</add> <add><del>man</del></add> <add> is personally</add> <lb/>he is not upon the whole unapt; though short of the<lb/> age antecedently to which, in the opinion of the<lb/>legislator in question, on the part of the average of<lb/> such persons as are capable of being chosen, <lb/>aptitude is not so probably as inaptitude, still in<lb/> the opinion of the only Judges who have the<lb/> means of observation, he is really apt. Whence<lb/> come so <del><gap/></del> <add>peremptory</add> a decision? Is it that<lb/> general presumption is an apter ground for action<lb/> than particular observation. No: but that on<lb/> this occasion the legislators themselves were<lb/> unapt were led astray by <del>an error</del> <add>a propensity- an error</add> (the causes<lb/> of which <add>see</add> below,) by self-conceit, by a <add>sort of</add> weakness<lb/> which is the ca<add>u</add>se of <del><unclear>silly</unclear></del> <add>ill judges</add> legislat<del>ors</del><add>ion</add> in<lb/> many instances besides this.</p>
   
   
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 05:51, 19 May 2014

Click Here To Edit

Evil effects from the conditions & power; actually but
not necessarily attached.

Evil 3-1. Age of the functionary not less than 30 years—
while the age of a member of the House of Representatives
need not be more than 25.

The reduction less Even tho restriction in the case of the House of
Representatives tho' so much less close, seems to be unwarranted: & if pernicious
upon the whole, even in that case, in the case of the Senate it cannot
but be still more pernicious.

In the opinion The persons- the Electors of the Electors to whom a man is known the <add>individual man is personally
he is not upon the whole unapt; though short of the
age antecedently to which, in the opinion of the
legislator in question, on the part of the average of
such persons as are capable of being chosen,
aptitude is not so probably as inaptitude, still in
the opinion of the only Judges who have the
means of observation, he is really apt. Whence
come so peremptory a decision? Is it that
general presumption is an apter ground for action
than particular observation. No: but that on
this occasion the legislators themselves were
unapt were led astray by an error a propensity- an error (the causes
of which see below,) by self-conceit, by a sort of weakness
which is the cause of silly ill judges legislatorsion in
many instances besides this.



Identifier: | JB/044/130/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 44.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

044

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

130

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f56

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

richard doane

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13915

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in