JB/107/262/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/107/262/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
<head>Evid: Prosp. View Peines</head>
<head>Evid: Prosp. View Peines</head>


<p>But (sugs somebody) if considered in a general and<lb/>
<p>But (says somebody) if considered in a general and<lb/>
abstracted point of view these several modes of conduct, does<add>has</add> <lb/>
abstracted point of view these several modes of conduct, does<add>has</add> <lb/>
not the end they have in view merit<add>also a claim to </add> consideration?<lb/>
not the end they have in view merit<add>also a claim to </add> consideration?<lb/>
and in consideration of that end is not softening<add>some mitigation</add> ddue to<lb/>
and in consideration of that end is not softening<add>some mitigation</add> ddue to<lb/>
the evasion conveyed by such haste <add>denominations?</add> names?</p>
the evasion conveyed by such haste <add>denominations?</add> names?</p>
<p>In this<add><gap/> this</add> apology In the apologies made<add>persecuted</add> in this<lb/>
str<gap/> we see the mischief: - the mischief which it is the<lb/>
object of this section to present in its genuine<add>true</add> colours.<lb/>
A cloak made for the <add>some of</add> most pernicious abuses that <lb/>
government or morality <del>are</del> susceptible of. Discuss in<lb/>
a variety of pernicious forms called in, <unclear>propriety</unclear> and <lb/>
wantonly called in, and diligently pl<gap/>ated<add>applied</add>, in the character<lb/>
of a remedy.</p>
<p><add>Yes</add> If the nature of the case admitted of us <del>more</del><lb/>
other remedy, the apology would have some weight,<lb/>
and the advantage of taking an account of profit and<lb/>
loss on both sides, loss from the first disease, and from the<lb/>
second profit by lessening the mischief<add>softening the symptoms</add> of the first, might<lb/>
perhaps pay for the expence.</p>





Revision as of 08:05, 20 May 2014

Click Here To Edit 28 Jan 1808 S.13.NL

Evid: Prosp. View Peines

But (says somebody) if considered in a general and
abstracted point of view these several modes of conduct, doeshas
not the end they have in view meritalso a claim to consideration?
and in consideration of that end is not softeningsome mitigation ddue to
the evasion conveyed by such haste denominations? names?

In this this apology In the apologies madepersecuted in this
str we see the mischief: - the mischief which it is the
object of this section to present in its genuinetrue colours.
A cloak made for the some of most pernicious abuses that
government or morality are susceptible of. Discuss in
a variety of pernicious forms called in, propriety and
wantonly called in, and diligently platedapplied, in the character
of a remedy.

Yes If the nature of the case admitted of us more
other remedy, the apology would have some weight,
and the advantage of taking an account of profit and
loss on both sides, loss from the first disease, and from the
second profit by lessening the mischiefsoftening the symptoms of the first, might
perhaps pay for the expence.







Identifier: | JB/107/262/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107.

Date_1

1808-01-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-2

Box

107

Main Headings

law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net)

Folio number

262

Info in main headings field

peines

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / e61

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

pr1

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

35253

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in