★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<p>may be said of them; and doubt against doubt, that <unclear><sic>expression</sic></unclear> is the least exceptionable which is the shortest<lb/> and most familiar.<lb/> The original deems to have been framed upon these considerations: 1. that <gap/>There are two ways in which<lb/> a man makes an advantage of his estate; <gap/>by taking either<gap/> the specific profits of it himself, or 2.a<lb/> price in lien of them:the word <gap/> was therefore inserted to express the 1st these cases. The words "Receipt <lb/>of t<lb/>he rents and profits" to express the 2- rather indeed for the sake of explanation than the word "<gap/>" was insufficient in a legal sense to include them both.2 that this however, to understand it literally <add>would com</add> might in-<lb/><add>-prize</add>-clude the condition of a bare Steward or Trustees; and therefore the restriction "in his right" was added. Lastly that these words being frequently put in contradistinction to <hi rend='underline'>"his wife's"</hi> might of themselves be understood to<lb/> be so here; & therefore the last mentioned words were coupled with them.</p> | <p>may be said of them; and doubt against doubt, that <unclear><sic>expression</sic></unclear> is the least exceptionable which is the shortest<lb/> and most familiar.<lb/> The original deems to have been framed upon these considerations: 1. that <gap/>There are two ways in which<lb/> a man makes an advantage of his estate; <gap/>by taking either<gap/> the specific profits of it himself, or 2.a<lb/> price in lien of them:the word <gap/> was therefore inserted to express the 1st these cases. The words "Receipt <lb/>of t<lb/>he rents and profits" to express the 2- rather indeed for the sake of explanation than the word "<gap/>" was insufficient in a legal sense to include them both.2 that this however, to understand it literally <add>would com</add> might in-<lb/><add>-prize</add>-clude the condition of a bare Steward or Trustees; and therefore the restriction "in his right" was added. Lastly that these words being frequently put in contradistinction to <hi rend='underline'>"his wife's"</hi> might of themselves be understood to<lb/> be so here; & therefore the last mentioned words were coupled with them.</p> | ||
<p>Now I can see no reason why the word " enjoyment" should not be understood to express all this. A man may<lb/>be said to enjoy an estate indifferently' where nothing more that a present enjoyment is required, whether it be<lb/>in his own right that he has come to it, or his wife's; whether it be by taking the specific profits himself or<lb/>a rent instead of them: and he can not be said to enjoy it, by taking the profits or the rent of it as a <lb/> Trustee or Steward for anther.</p> | <p>Now I can see no reason why the word " enjoyment" should not be understood to express all this. A man may<lb/>be said to enjoy an estate indifferently' where nothing more that a present enjoyment is required, whether it be<lb/>in his own right that he has come to it, or his wife's; whether it be by taking the specific profits himself or<lb/>a rent instead of them: and he can not be said to enjoy it, by taking the profits or the rent of it as a <lb/> Trustee or Steward for anther.</p> | ||
<p>I have said, a present enjoyment; for it is remarkable that nothing more is here required: if it is from<lb/> this circumstance that it seems as if the design were rather to secure a certain rank in the persons invested with these truth, than a certain fortune' under the notion that a real estate to the amount specified is not<lb/>likely to have been though for over so short a time in the hands of persons of that mean condition which it is endeavoured to exclude. In the other view the provision is | <p>I have said, a present enjoyment; for it is remarkable that nothing more is here required: if it is from<lb/> this circumstance that it seems as if the design were rather to secure a certain rank in the persons invested with these truth, than a certain fortune' under the notion that a real estate to the amount specified is not<lb/>likely to have been though for over so short a time in the hands of persons of that mean condition which it is endeavoured to exclude. In the other view the provision is manifestly imperfect. In any view in-<lb/> -deed consequences seem to arise from this latitude <del>deleted text</del> <hi rend='superscript'>scarce consistent</hi> with the design; that Estates holden of<lb/> Will; by Sufferance; by Statute - Merchant or <gap/> in satisfaction for a small debt, by the discharge of<lb/> which they might be annihilated in an instant; that <del>all</del> <add>any of</add> these, I say, might respectively constitute a quali-<lb/> -fication: estates <del>that</del> <add>most of which</add> might easily be created for the purpose . were there any thing in the office <del>that</del> to<lb/> make it worth the while.<lb/> <p>[... Lands Tenements and Hereditaments... O.] These 3 terms, it is observable, although the last of them, besides<lb/> what may be peculiar to itself, <gap/> the full import of the other two, are constantly brought in in a <gap/> like<lb/> <gap/> and <gap/> in the <gap/>. The practise indeed, whatever may have been it's origin, whether an attachment<lb/> to a particular kind of <unclear>jingle</unclear>, or the common propensity of <hi rend='superscript'>in</hi> the dealers in this kind of ware to fill the <gap/><lb/><gap/>, will not, while the people have so little opportunity as they have at present of acquiring legal knowledge,<lb/> be altogether without a reason. The word <hi rend='underline'>Hereditaments</hi> were it to stand singly, would be absolutely unintelligible<lb/> to the greatest number: there is not one <del>deleted text</del> in ten who knows an Hereditament from a salamander:<lb/> nor one in a thousand, even among persons of education who has an adequate Idea of it; and thence it is<lb/> that the others, ill-defined as their own meaning is in the conceptions of <del>deleted text</del> the generality, are yet <hi rend='superscript'>become notwithstanding</hi> in a manner<lb/> necessary to put <del>deleted text</del> <hi rend='superscript'>men</hi> upon the scent of it's signification.</p><lb/> <p>[... Lands, <hi rend='superscript'>Buildings</hi> <gap/> Offices & Franchises ... N. ] These are all the sorts of Hereditaments <del>deleted text</del> (Annuities ex-<lb/> -cepted which from the difference in point of <unclear>notoriety</unclear> and security it seems hardly to have been intended to rank<lb/> with these) which can produce an annual income: <hi rend='superscript'>take them together, they form an</hi> the expression <hi rend='superscript'>which</hi> is as short as that in the original; <hi rend='superscript'>which</hi> <unclear>I</unclear> would be <lb/> quite so, were the word [Franchises] omitted as perhaps it might be without any inconveniences, that is without having <lb/> the effect of excluding any person who would be admissible if it were inserted. However this be, the compiler it is plain <lb/> set no great store by any of the Hereditaments besides <hi rend='underline'>Lands</hi>, since he has dropped the in the case of Heir- <lb/> -ship a few lines after</p><lb/> <p>When nothing is to be gained in point of brevity, it is to no purpose to have recourse to generic expressions <lb/> which always the more general they are, that is the more abstract, are the less familiar, and therefore the less intel- <lb/> -ligible. Now what a man is obliged to swear to, it is fit he should be able to understand.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
TURNPIKE - TRUSTEES.
Ovservations continued
may be said of them; and doubt against doubt, that expression is the least exceptionable which is the shortest
and most familiar.
The original deems to have been framed upon these considerations: 1. that There are two ways in which
a man makes an advantage of his estate; by taking either the specific profits of it himself, or 2.a
price in lien of them:the word was therefore inserted to express the 1st these cases. The words "Receipt
of t
he rents and profits" to express the 2- rather indeed for the sake of explanation than the word "" was insufficient in a legal sense to include them both.2 that this however, to understand it literally would com might in-
-prize-clude the condition of a bare Steward or Trustees; and therefore the restriction "in his right" was added. Lastly that these words being frequently put in contradistinction to "his wife's" might of themselves be understood to
be so here; & therefore the last mentioned words were coupled with them.
Now I can see no reason why the word " enjoyment" should not be understood to express all this. A man may
be said to enjoy an estate indifferently' where nothing more that a present enjoyment is required, whether it be
in his own right that he has come to it, or his wife's; whether it be by taking the specific profits himself or
a rent instead of them: and he can not be said to enjoy it, by taking the profits or the rent of it as a
Trustee or Steward for anther.
I have said, a present enjoyment; for it is remarkable that nothing more is here required: if it is from
this circumstance that it seems as if the design were rather to secure a certain rank in the persons invested with these truth, than a certain fortune' under the notion that a real estate to the amount specified is not
likely to have been though for over so short a time in the hands of persons of that mean condition which it is endeavoured to exclude. In the other view the provision is manifestly imperfect. In any view in-
-deed consequences seem to arise from this latitude deleted text scarce consistent with the design; that Estates holden of
Will; by Sufferance; by Statute - Merchant or in satisfaction for a small debt, by the discharge of
which they might be annihilated in an instant; that all any of these, I say, might respectively constitute a quali-
-fication: estates that most of which might easily be created for the purpose . were there any thing in the office that to
make it worth the while.
[... Lands Tenements and Hereditaments... O.] These 3 terms, it is observable, although the last of them, besides
what may be peculiar to itself, the full import of the other two, are constantly brought in in a like
and in the . The practise indeed, whatever may have been it's origin, whether an attachment
to a particular kind of jingle, or the common propensity of in the dealers in this kind of ware to fill the
, will not, while the people have so little opportunity as they have at present of acquiring legal knowledge,
be altogether without a reason. The word Hereditaments were it to stand singly, would be absolutely unintelligible
to the greatest number: there is not one deleted text in ten who knows an Hereditament from a salamander:
nor one in a thousand, even among persons of education who has an adequate Idea of it; and thence it is
that the others, ill-defined as their own meaning is in the conceptions of deleted text the generality, are yet become notwithstanding in a manner
necessary to put deleted text men upon the scent of it's signification.
[... Lands, Buildings Offices & Franchises ... N. ] These are all the sorts of Hereditaments deleted text (Annuities ex-
-cepted which from the difference in point of notoriety and security it seems hardly to have been intended to rank
with these) which can produce an annual income: take them together, they form an the expression which is as short as that in the original; which I would be
quite so, were the word [Franchises] omitted as perhaps it might be without any inconveniences, that is without having
the effect of excluding any person who would be admissible if it were inserted. However this be, the compiler it is plain
set no great store by any of the Hereditaments besides Lands, since he has dropped the in the case of Heir-
-ship a few lines after
When nothing is to be gained in point of brevity, it is to no purpose to have recourse to generic expressions
which always the more general they are, that is the more abstract, are the less familiar, and therefore the less intel-
-ligible. Now what a man is obliged to swear to, it is fit he should be able to understand.
Identifier: | JB/095/065/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
095 |
|||
065 |
sect. ii turnpike-trustees |
||
001 |
observations continued |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
|||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
30951 |
|||