JB/015/181/001

Click Here To Edit

MS Ethics, Vol.II

purpose: our business was to enquire not what people think, but what
they ought to think. Thereupon the modern gives kicks the ancient a kick in
the breech, or spits in his face, or if he is strong enough throw him behind
the fire, one can think of no other method of continuing the debate that is
at once natural and consistent.

If you can persuade them both to take the principle of utility for their
guide, the discourse will take another turn: the result will be either that they
will agree; or that if they disagree it will be about some facts: and there is no
occasion for supposing either of them to be so unreasonable as to be angry with
his opponent for entertaining a different opinion from his own concerning a
matter of fact: they will separate with a resolution to make enquiries that
shall tend to clear up some of the facts, if they are in their nature capable of being
cleared up to the satisfaction of the enquiring party: of with under the view conviction
of the impossibility of coming to an agreement in with the resolution of each
acting up to his own opinion, satisfied at least in some degree with seeing
upon what the point of the dispute turns.

I have said that Thus the subject of their disagreement when they came to a conclusion if they ended would

be

Identifier: | JB/015/181/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	015	Main Headings	deontology
Folio number	181	Info in main headings field	ms ethics vol. ii
Image	001	Titles
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f15
Penner	sir john bowring	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	5397
Box Contents