JB/118/093/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/118/093/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
ChrisRiley (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>would not be equally convenient with reference to the<lb/> public, as according to the Act it ought to be.</p>
 
<p>Does the Act then put the choice of the spot in the<lb/> power of an individual, in the power of your Memorialist,<lb/> altogether? Does it give him a negative <lb/> upon it in every case? By no means. It gives<lb/> him no negative, upon the choice of that best of all<lb/> spots, which has been chosen by such high authority,<lb/> and after such mature deliberation. <lb/> or inconvenient to <hi rend="underline">him</hi>, your Lordships may<lb/> call upon him to take <hi rend="underline">that</hi> or none. He has pronounced<lb/> it convenient, he is estopped from calling<lb/> it otherwise. Could he, pointing to any new<lb/> spot, say, <hi rend="underline">this would be more convenient to me<lb/> than the old one</hi>, <hi rend="underline">therefore you are bound to give <lb/> it me instead?</hi> &#x2014; No certainly; not even were he<lb/> able to <sic>shew</sic> that it would be still more <hi rend="underline">convenient</hi><lb/> &amp; <hi rend="underline">proper</hi> with reference to the public in every<lb/> point of view. The Act <hi rend="underline"><sic>admitts</sic></hi> that other spots<lb/> may perhaps be found "<hi rend="underline">as</hi> convenient &amp; proper:"<lb/> but it does not <sic>admitt</sic> that any can be <hi rend="underline">more</hi> so.<lb/> Hard indeed then would it be, if while one party<lb/> upon your Memorialist, were bound, the other party, <lb/> the public, whom your Lordships represent,<lb/> should be altogether free.</p>
<add>Even</add>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 13:26, 5 June 2014

Click Here To Edit

would not be equally convenient with reference to the
public, as according to the Act it ought to be.

Does the Act then put the choice of the spot in the
power of an individual, in the power of your Memorialist,
altogether? Does it give him a negative
upon it in every case? By no means. It gives
him no negative, upon the choice of that best of all
spots, which has been chosen by such high authority,
and after such mature deliberation.
or inconvenient to him, your Lordships may
call upon him to take that or none. He has pronounced
it convenient, he is estopped from calling
it otherwise. Could he, pointing to any new
spot, say, this would be more convenient to me
than the old one
, therefore you are bound to give
it me instead?
— No certainly; not even were he
able to shew that it would be still more convenient
& proper with reference to the public in every
point of view. The Act admitts that other spots
may perhaps be found "as convenient & proper:"
but it does not admitt that any can be more so.
Hard indeed then would it be, if while one party
upon your Memorialist, were bound, the other party,
the public, whom your Lordships represent,
should be altogether free.

Even



Identifier: | JB/118/093/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

118

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

093

Info in main headings field

Image

003

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f31 / f32 / f33 / f34

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

39147

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in