JB/039/200/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/039/200/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
ChrisRiley (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''[{{fullurl:JB/039/200/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --><head>1826. Sept<hi rend="superscript">m</hi>. 4.</head><head>Constitut. <del>Condt</del> Code. Ch.IX. S.16. Supplement.</head><p>Addition to the note ending at p65.</p><p>In the formation of the immediately acting<lb/> list, a sort of gauge veil, with a colouring of <hi rend="underline">chance</hi><lb/> upon it, is thrown over the packing machinery as<lb/> above. But the <hi rend="underline">original</hi> list, out of which this immediately<lb/> acting list is thus to be packed by whom and<lb/> how is it to be formed? Answer. By a <add>the sheriff</add> &#x2014; member of the <lb/> Aristocracy, named every year by the King. <del>& the Sheriff</del> <lb/>This, per SS.13. 14. without disguise. And, lest this original<lb/> garbling should not suffice, by whom is this<lb/> garbled list to be regarded? Answer. By the very<lb/> Judicatories, whose power of garbling was the grievance,<lb/> to which this statute is the <del>pretended</del> <add>proffered and supposed</add> remedy: for, by<lb/> S.20, all the great criminal Courts, commencing<lb/> with "the King's Bench," are expressly confined in the<lb/> power of doing whatever they please in regard to the selection<lb/> of jurors &#x2014; "in manner heretofore used and accustomed,"<lb/> by "order, orally or otherwise... amending or<lb/> "enlarging the pan<hi rend="superscript">n</hi>el of jurors returned for the trial of <lb/>"any such issue." And this <hi rend="underline">heretofore known and accustomed<lb/>manner</hi> supposing the existence of any possibility<lb/> of knowing it, by whom is this possibility possessed?<lb/> By the Judges, and them alone: by the judges who, on<lb/> each individual occasion, cause <del>it</del> <add>this supposed check upon their conduct</add> to be whatsoever<lb/> best suits their purpose.</p><p>Thus by this Statute is the <del><gap/></del> <add><del>proffered and supposedly</del></add><lb/> <del><gap/></del> <add>acknowledged</add> grievance, <add>instead of being a fruitful remedy</add> aggravated to the every uttermost:<lb/> and the jury system &#x2014; the supposed check to despotism &#x2014; <lb/>, and <add>so far as it is a</add> <del>if it were indeed a</del> check, the only check <add>by law</add> <del>has</del> established &#x2014;<lb/> converted, from a feeble and very <del>most</del> imperfect <hi rend="underline">check</hi>,<lb/> into a most powerful <hi rend="underline">instrument</hi>.</p><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
'''[{{fullurl:JB/039/200/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 10:00, 13 June 2014

Click Here To Edit1826. Septm. 4.Constitut. Condt Code. Ch.IX. S.16. Supplement.

Addition to the note ending at p65.

In the formation of the immediately acting
list, a sort of gauge veil, with a colouring of chance
upon it, is thrown over the packing machinery as
above. But the original list, out of which this immediately
acting list is thus to be packed by whom and
how is it to be formed? Answer. By a the sheriff — member of the
Aristocracy, named every year by the King. & the Sheriff
This, per SS.13. 14. without disguise. And, lest this original
garbling should not suffice, by whom is this
garbled list to be regarded? Answer. By the very
Judicatories, whose power of garbling was the grievance,
to which this statute is the pretended proffered and supposed remedy: for, by
S.20, all the great criminal Courts, commencing
with "the King's Bench," are expressly confined in the
power of doing whatever they please in regard to the selection
of jurors — "in manner heretofore used and accustomed,"
by "order, orally or otherwise... amending or
"enlarging the pannel of jurors returned for the trial of
"any such issue." And this heretofore known and accustomed
manner
supposing the existence of any possibility
of knowing it, by whom is this possibility possessed?
By the Judges, and them alone: by the judges who, on
each individual occasion, cause it this supposed check upon their conduct to be whatsoever
best suits their purpose.

Thus by this Statute is the proffered and supposedly
acknowledged grievance, instead of being a fruitful remedy aggravated to the every uttermost:
and the jury system — the supposed check to despotism —
, and so far as it is a if it were indeed a check, the only check by law has established —
converted, from a feeble and very most imperfect check,
into a most powerful instrument.


Identifier: | JB/039/200/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 39.

Date_1

1826-09-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

039

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

200

Info in main headings field

const. code ch. ix supplement

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

12207

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in