JB/096/001/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/001/003: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<gap/>'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/001/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<gap/>'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/001/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p><!-- in red -->Or perhaps we mistake our Author's meaning. <del>by</del> We<lb/> suppose<del>ng</del><!-- he wrote over the i and turned it into an e when he made it suppose instead of supposing --> the idea of obligation to imply <del>a power of choice</del>, a<lb/>  
 
<!-- in brown -->misled by sound, as to imagine that the action<lb/>
 
<!-- in red -->power of doing or not doing; whereas our Author means all the while<lb/>
<p>misled by sound, as to imagine that the action <add>Or perhaps we mistake our Author's meaning. <del>by</del> We suppose<del>ng</del> the idea of obligation to imply <del>a power of choice</del>, a</add>
that we are not <sic>bounden</sic> by the Laws of another unless they do by<lb/>  
<lb/>  
<!-- in brown -->of the stone, which he drops from his hand, is<lb/>
of the stone, which he drops from his hand, is <add>power of doing or not doing; whereas our Author means all the while  
<!-- in red -->some natural violence so constrain us, as to render it impossible<lb/> for us to act otherwise than as they direct us. And indeed<lb/>  
that we are not <sic>bounden</sic> by the Laws of another unless they do by</add>
<!-- in brown -->the same kind of action as the action of a free<lb/>
<lb/>
<!-- in red -->in another place,<add>+</add> <note>+ Vol.1.p.57.</note> <del>our Author
the same kind of action as the action of a free
</del> <add>he</add> declares this to be<lb/> the strict sense of obligation.<lb/>  
<add>some natural violence so constrain us, as to render it impossible for us to act otherwise than as they direct us. And indeed</add>
<!-- In Brown -->agent. Could he with any propriety, say, that<lb/>
<lb/>  
<!-- In red -->Hence I suppose <del>it is that</del> he tells us <del>here</del> - that<lb/>
<note>+ Vol.1.p.57.</note> agent. Could he with any propriety, say, that <add>in another place,<hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <del>our Author
<!-- in brown -->the stone is bound, is under an obligation, to<lb/>
</del> <add>he</add> declares this to be the strict sense of obligation.</add>
<!-- in red -->"Man, considered as a Creature, must necessarily be abject to the<lb/>
<lb/>  
<gap/> of his Creator- for he is entirely a dependent Being:<lb/>
the stone is bound, is under an obligation, to<add>Hence I suppose <del>it is that</del> he tells us <del>here</del> - that</add>
<!-- in brown --> gravilate.<hi rend='superscript'>a</hi><lb/>
<lb/>
<!-- in red -->"And again that a state of dependence will <unclear>inevitably</unclear> oblige the<lb/>
gravitate.<hi rend='superscript'>a</hi> <add>"Man, considered as a Creature, must necessarily be abject to the <gap/> of his Creator- for he is entirely a dependent Being:</add>
<!-- in brown -->The reader, perhaps, might not have known,<lb/>
</p>
<!-- in red -->"inferior to take the will of him on whom he depends, as the<lb/>
 
"rule of his conduct, in all there points wherein his dependence<lb/>
<p>
<!-- in brown -->whether the learned author meant to elevate<lb/>
The reader, perhaps, might not have known, <add>"And again that a state of dependence will <unclear>inevitably</unclear> oblige the</add>
<!-- in red -->"consists;- &amp; therefore that as a man depends absolutely when his<lb/>
<lb/>
"maker for every thing, it is necessary that he <unclear>thined</unclear> in all<lb/>
whether the learned author meant to elevate <add>"inferior to take the will of him on whom he depends, as the "rule of his conduct, in all there points wherein his dependence</add>
<!-- in brown -->inactive matter to the rank of a free agent<lb/>
<lb/>
<!-- in red -->"him to conform to his maker's will.'<lb/></p>
inactive matter to the rank of a free agent <add>"consists;- &amp; therefore that as a man depends absolutely when his
<p><!-- in red -->This restriction of the <del>word</del> sense of the word <hi rend='underline'>"bounden"</hi> may<lb/>
"maker for every thing, it is necessary that he <unclear>thined</unclear> in all</add>
<!-- in brown -->or to degrade man to the level of inactive matter.<lb/>
<lb/>
<!-- in red -->remove the <unclear>contradiction</unclear>, of applying the <del>idea of obligation</del><add>term<gap/></add> to<lb/>
or to degrade man to the level of inactive matter. <add>"him to conform to his maker's will.'
things animate &amp; inanimate: But then it brings a greater<lb/>
This restriction of the <del>word</del> sense of the word <hi rend='underline'>"bounden"</hi> may</add>
<!-- in brown -->In the next page his doubts will be satisfied:<lb/>
<lb/>
<!-- In red -->difficulty in it's stead. _ For if it be true, as these words of<lb/>
In the next page his doubts will be satisfied: <add>remove the <unclear>contradiction</unclear>, of applying the <del>idea of obligation</del><add>term<gap/></add> to
our author do declare, that the moral conduct of a man<lb/>
things animate &amp; inanimate: But then it brings a greater</add>
<!-- in brown -->for the author there tells him that, "Man, <del>as a</del> p 39.
<lb/>
<!-- in red -->is no more left to his own will, than digestion, sensetion, or any<lb/>
for the author there tells him that, "Man, <del>as a</del> p 39.
<!-- in brown -->"<add>"considered as</add> creature,<gap/> necessarily be subject to the<lb/>
<add>difficulty in it's stead. _ For if it be true, as these words of our author do declare, that the moral conduct of a man</add><lb/>
<!-- in red -->other <del><gap/>deleted text</del><add>branch</add>of <add>meer</add> vital oeconomy<!-- ligature -->, but is directed in the same<lb/>
<add>"considered as</add> creature,<gap/> necessarily be subject to the  <add>is no more left to his own will, than digestion, sensation, or any</add>
<!-- in brown -->"<del>will</del><add>laws</add> of his Creator, for he is entirely a dependent<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>involuntary</add><pb/>
<del>will</del><add>laws</add> of his Creator, for he is entirely a dependent
<add>other <del><gap/>deleted text</del><add>branch</add>of <add>meer</add> vital oeconomy<!-- ligature -->, but is directed in the same</add><lb/>
<add>involuntary</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 10:04, 13 January 2011

Click Here To Edit


misled by sound, as to imagine that the action Or perhaps we mistake our Author's meaning. by We supposeng the idea of obligation to imply a power of choice, a
of the stone, which he drops from his hand, is power of doing or not doing; whereas our Author means all the while that we are not bounden by the Laws of another unless they do by
the same kind of action as the action of a free some natural violence so constrain us, as to render it impossible for us to act otherwise than as they direct us. And indeed
+ Vol.1.p.57. agent. Could he with any propriety, say, that in another place,+ our Author <add>he declares this to be the strict sense of obligation.</add>
the stone is bound, is under an obligation, toHence I suppose it is that he tells us here - that
gravitate.a "Man, considered as a Creature, must necessarily be abject to the of his Creator- for he is entirely a dependent Being:

The reader, perhaps, might not have known, "And again that a state of dependence will inevitably oblige the
whether the learned author meant to elevate "inferior to take the will of him on whom he depends, as the "rule of his conduct, in all there points wherein his dependence
inactive matter to the rank of a free agent "consists;- & therefore that as a man depends absolutely when his "maker for every thing, it is necessary that he thined in all
or to degrade man to the level of inactive matter. "him to conform to his maker's will.' This restriction of the word sense of the word "bounden" may
In the next page his doubts will be satisfied: remove the contradiction, of applying the idea of obligation<add>term to things animate & inanimate: But then it brings a greater</add>
for the author there tells him that, "Man, as a p 39. difficulty in it's stead. _ For if it be true, as these words of our author do declare, that the moral conduct of a man
"considered as creature, necessarily be subject to the is no more left to his own will, than digestion, sensation, or any
willlaws of his Creator, for he is entirely a dependent other deleted text<add>branchof meer vital oeconomy, but is directed in the same</add>
involuntary


Identifier: | JB/096/001/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

001

Info in main headings field

Image

003

Titles

section i / account of laws in general

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 f1 / c2 / c3 / c4

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31005

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in