JB/034/057/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/034/057/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
ChrisRiley (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:


'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/057/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/057/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --><head>1823. Sept<hi rend="superscript">m</hi>. 10.</head><head>Constitutional Code</head><p><note>III Rationale</note><lb/><note>Ch. Quasi Jury</note><lb/><note>S. Explan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> Observato<hi rend="superscript">ns</note><lb/><note>II Discarded Features</note></p><p>117.</p><p>II. Hollow features pregnant <lb/>with evil opposite<lb/> to collateral end of<lb/> justice.<lb/>12. Evil. 1. Needless vexation<lb/> or <sic>expence</sic>, or<lb/> both, from needless<lb/> magnitude of their<lb/> number: viz<lb/>1. Actually serving in<lb/> each suit, 12.<lb/>2. Obligatorily attending<lb/> for all the suits, 48.<lb/>In Quasi Jury, both<lb/> numbers minimized.</p><p>118.</p><p>3. <hi rend="underline">Challenging</hi>, a further<lb/> enhancement of<lb/> the evil: viz 1. to <hi rend="underline">polls</hi><lb/> 2. to array. Definitions<lb/> as to both, presently.</p><p>119.</p><p>4. Further eventual<lb/> vexation, imposable<lb/> by any juror on the <lb/> rest, the lasting for the<lb/> extortion of the perjurious<lb/> consent.</p><p>120.</p><p>Challenge  to the array, <lb/> compared with cases<lb/> where admitted, d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. when<lb/> not admitted, are a<lb/> mockery of justice.<lb/>Admitted between A<lb/> and B: not between<lb/> King and B. By King's <lb/> Locatee, the Sheriff<lb/> <gap/> private relationship,<lb/> compared with<lb/> d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. from King<lb/><add>thus</add></p><pb/><p>120 contin<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.</p><p>Thus per Lawyer's own <lb/> principle, as above,<lb/> verdict for King has<lb/> corruption for it's cause.</p><p>121.</p><p>Particularly where the <lb/> jury is special: in<lb/> Middlesex, locator crown<lb/> office master, creature<lb/> of the judge, and dependent <lb/> in possession or<lb/> expectancy on the King.</p><p>122.</p><p>In special jurymen,<lb/> further cause of partiality<lb/> to Monarch and <lb/> Aristocrat by the pay<lb/> given to them, selected<lb/> for their opulence,<lb/> while none is given <lb/> to the most indigent<lb/> [Add common jurymen<lb/> compelled &#x2014; <lb/> special d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. not] as<lb/> if partiality to their<lb/> own class was not<lb/> sure enough without<lb/> this <del><gap/></del> <add>bribe</add>.</p><p>123.</p><p>Till lately the bribe<lb/> was more barefaced<lb/> <hi rend="underline">one</hi> guinea when<lb/> verdict was <hi rend="underline">against</hi><lb/> the King, <hi rend="underline">two</hi> when <hi rend="underline">for</hi><lb/>him. This practice<lb/> may be removed<lb/>at any time.</p><pb/><p>124.</p><p>Anglicé &#x2014; more gained<lb/> than elsewhere by<lb/> judges by corruption.<lb/>Elsewhere, it is by<lb/> law in all forms<lb/> punishable: here, in<lb/> the most valuable<lb/> forms sanctioned.</p><p>125.</p><p>For corruption in<lb/> any shape in high<lb/> functionary, Defendant,<lb/> in case of prosecution,<lb/> would have<lb/> his partners in it<lb/> for judges.</p><p>126.</p><p>Self-confessed peculator<lb/> for £10,00, Lord<lb/> Melville was pronounced<lb/> not guilty<lb/> upon the honor of a<lb/> majority of his noble<lb/> judges. Self-confessed<lb/> notwithstanding the<lb/> clause inserted by Attorney<lb/> General <gap/><lb/> in an Act for excluding<lb/> in that case<lb/> that evidence.</p><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 13:38, 13 June 2014

Click Here To Edit1823. Septm. 10.Constitutional Code

III Rationale
Ch. Quasi Jury
S. Explany Observato<hi rend="superscript">ns
II Discarded Features

117.

II. Hollow features pregnant
with evil opposite
to collateral end of
justice.
12. Evil. 1. Needless vexation
or expence, or
both, from needless
magnitude of their
number: viz
1. Actually serving in
each suit, 12.
2. Obligatorily attending
for all the suits, 48.
In Quasi Jury, both
numbers minimized.

118.

3. Challenging, a further
enhancement of
the evil: viz 1. to polls
2. to array. Definitions
as to both, presently.

119.

4. Further eventual
vexation, imposable
by any juror on the
rest, the lasting for the
extortion of the perjurious
consent.

120.

Challenge to the array,
compared with cases
where admitted, do. when
not admitted, are a
mockery of justice.
Admitted between A
and B: not between
King and B. By King's
Locatee, the Sheriff
private relationship,
compared with
do. from King
thus


---page break---

120 contind.

Thus per Lawyer's own
principle, as above,
verdict for King has
corruption for it's cause.

121.

Particularly where the
jury is special: in
Middlesex, locator crown
office master, creature
of the judge, and dependent
in possession or
expectancy on the King.

122.

In special jurymen,
further cause of partiality
to Monarch and
Aristocrat by the pay
given to them, selected
for their opulence,
while none is given
to the most indigent
[Add common jurymen
compelled —
special do. not] as
if partiality to their
own class was not
sure enough without
this bribe.

123.

Till lately the bribe
was more barefaced
one guinea when
verdict was against
the King, two when for
him. This practice
may be removed
at any time.


---page break---

124.

Anglicé — more gained
than elsewhere by
judges by corruption.
Elsewhere, it is by
law in all forms
punishable: here, in
the most valuable
forms sanctioned.

125.

For corruption in
any shape in high
functionary, Defendant,
in case of prosecution,
would have
his partners in it
for judges.

126.

Self-confessed peculator
for £10,00, Lord
Melville was pronounced
not guilty
upon the honor of a
majority of his noble
judges. Self-confessed
notwithstanding the
clause inserted by Attorney
General
in an Act for excluding
in that case
that evidence.


Identifier: | JB/034/057/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-09-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

117-126

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

057

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

quasi jury

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d15

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

10331

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in